当前位置: X-MOL 学术Paddy Water Environ. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Nutrient management impacts on net ecosystem carbon budget and energy flow nexus in intensively cultivated cropland ecosystems of north-western India
Paddy and Water Environment ( IF 2.2 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-29 , DOI: 10.1007/s10333-020-00812-9
Pritpal Singh , Dinesh Kumar Benbi

Nutrient management has led to unprecedented increase in crop production, but with significant carbon (C) trade-off that has close nexus with energy flow. We quantified the impacts of nutrient management on emission of greenhouse gases, net ecosystem C budget (NECB) and energy flow in three cropland ecosystems (rice–wheat, maize–wheat and cotton–wheat). Carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in rice than cotton, while maize ecosystem was in-between. The greenhouse gas intensity was significantly higher for rice–wheat (by 0.2 kg CO2e kg−1 grain) and maize–wheat (by 0.1 kg CO2e kg−1 grain), compared with cotton–wheat. The higher carbon emission ratio for maize–wheat (9.59) and rice–wheat (8.07) suggested their higher potential to fix C per unit loss, compared with cotton–wheat (7.03). Atmospheric CO2 assimilated into net primary production (NPP) totalled 14.1 ± 0.18, 11.5 ± 0.13 and 9.7 ± 0.13 Mg C ha−1 for rice–wheat, maize–wheat and cotton–wheat ecosystems, respectively. With an estimated net ecosystem exchange of 9.5 ± 0.29, 5.8 ± 0.19 and 2.7 ± 0.23 Mg C ha−1, respectively, for three ecosystems, rice–wheat (2427 kg C ha−1 year−1) had significantly higher NECB, compared with maize–wheat (27.1 kg C ha−1 year−1) and cotton–wheat (− 3834 kg C ha−1 year−1). Rice–wheat had significantly higher C addition in soil organic carbon (SOC) pool, compared with other two ecosystems. Conversely, cotton–wheat had depletion of SOC pool (− 817 kg C ha−1). Although the three ecosystems did not differ significantly for fertilizer-related energy input (EI), energy output (EO), energy ratio (ER) and net energy gain were significantly higher for cotton–wheat, compared with other ecosystems.



中文翻译:

营养管理对印度西北集约耕地生态系统中净生态系统碳预算和能量流联系的影响

营养管理已导致作物产量空前提高,但碳(C)的权衡取舍与能量流动密切相关。我们量化了养分管理对三种农田生态系统(稻-小麦,玉米-小麦和棉花-小麦)中温室气体排放,净生态系统碳预算(NECB)和能量流的影响。 水稻中的二氧化碳(CO 2)和一氧化二氮(N 2 O)排放量显着高于棉花(p <0.05),而玉米生态系统介于两者之间。温室气体强度显著更高为稻麦(0.2公斤CO 2E 千克-1谷物)和玉米小麦(0.1公斤CO 2E千克-1谷物),而不是棉麦。与棉麦(7.03)相比,玉米-小麦(9.59)和水稻-小麦(8.07)较高的碳排放比表明它们具有更高的固定单位损失碳的潜力。稻麦,玉米麦和棉麦生态系统中,被吸收为净初级生产(NPP)的大气CO 2总计分别为14.1±0.18、11.5±0.13和9.7±0.13 Mg C ha -1。估计三个生态系统的净生态系统净交换量分别为9.5±0.29、5.8±0.19和2.7±0.23 Mg C ha -1,相比之下,稻麦(2427 kg C ha - 1 年-1)的NECB显着更高。玉米-小麦(27.1 kg C公顷- 1 年-1)和棉花-小麦(− 3834 kg C公顷- 1 年-1)。与其他两个生态系统相比,稻麦在土壤有机碳(SOC)库中的碳添加量明显更高。相反,棉/小麦的SOC储备不足(− 817 kg C ha -1)。尽管三种生态系统的肥料相关能量输入(E I)没有显着差异,但是与其他生态系统相比,棉小麦的能量输出(E O),能量比(E R)和净能量获取显着更高。

更新日期:2020-07-29
down
wechat
bug