当前位置: X-MOL 学术Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America ( IF 11.1 ) Pub Date : 2020-08-11 , DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1917036117
Samantha Joel 1 , Paul W Eastwick 2 , Colleen J Allison 3 , Ximena B Arriaga 4 , Zachary G Baker 5 , Eran Bar-Kalifa 6 , Sophie Bergeron 7 , Gurit E Birnbaum 8 , Rebecca L Brock 9 , Claudia C Brumbaugh 10 , Cheryl L Carmichael 11 , Serena Chen 12 , Jennifer Clarke 13 , Rebecca J Cobb 14 , Michael K Coolsen 15 , Jody Davis 16 , David C de Jong 17 , Anik Debrot 18 , Eva C DeHaas 3 , Jaye L Derrick 5 , Jami Eller 19 , Marie-Joelle Estrada 20 , Ruddy Faure 21 , Eli J Finkel 22 , R Chris Fraley 23 , Shelly L Gable 24 , Reuma Gadassi-Polack 25 , Yuthika U Girme 3 , Amie M Gordon 26 , Courtney L Gosnell 27 , Matthew D Hammond 28 , Peggy A Hannon 29 , Cheryl Harasymchuk 30 , Wilhelm Hofmann 31 , Andrea B Horn 32 , Emily A Impett 33 , Jeremy P Jamieson 20 , Dacher Keltner 11 , James J Kim 34 , Jeffrey L Kirchner 35 , Esther S Kluwer 36, 37 , Madoka Kumashiro 38 , Grace Larson 39 , Gal Lazarus 40 , Jill M Logan 3 , Laura B Luchies 41 , Geoff MacDonald 34 , Laura V Machia 42 , Michael R Maniaci 43 , Jessica A Maxwell 44 , Moran Mizrahi 45 , Amy Muise 46 , Sylvia Niehuis 14 , Brian G Ogolsky 47 , C Rebecca Oldham 14 , Nickola C Overall 44 , Meinrad Perrez 48 , Brett J Peters 49 , Paula R Pietromonaco 50 , Sally I Powers 50 , Thery Prok 24 , Rony Pshedetzky-Shochat 40 , Eshkol Rafaeli 40, 51 , Erin L Ramsdell 9 , Maija Reblin 52 , Michael Reicherts 48 , Alan Reifman 14 , Harry T Reis 20 , Galena K Rhoades 53 , William S Rholes 54 , Francesca Righetti 21 , Lindsey M Rodriguez 55 , Ron Rogge 20 , Natalie O Rosen 56 , Darby Saxbe 57 , Haran Sened 40 , Jeffry A Simpson 19 , Erica B Slotter 58 , Scott M Stanley 53 , Shevaun Stocker 59 , Cathy Surra 60 , Hagar Ter Kuile 36 , Allison A Vaughn 61 , Amanda M Vicary 62 , Mariko L Visserman 34, 46 , Scott Wolf 35
Affiliation  

Given the powerful implications of relationship quality for health and well-being, a central mission of relationship science is explaining why some romantic relationships thrive more than others. This large-scale project used machine learning (i.e., Random Forests) to 1) quantify the extent to which relationship quality is predictable and 2) identify which constructs reliably predict relationship quality. Across 43 dyadic longitudinal datasets from 29 laboratories, the top relationship-specific predictors of relationship quality were perceived-partner commitment, appreciation, sexual satisfaction, perceived-partner satisfaction, and conflict. The top individual-difference predictors were life satisfaction, negative affect, depression, attachment avoidance, and attachment anxiety. Overall, relationship-specific variables predicted up to 45% of variance at baseline, and up to 18% of variance at the end of each study. Individual differences also performed well (21% and 12%, respectively). Actor-reported variables (i.e., own relationship-specific and individual-difference variables) predicted two to four times more variance than partner-reported variables (i.e., the partner’s ratings on those variables). Importantly, individual differences and partner reports had no predictive effects beyond actor-reported relationship-specific variables alone. These findings imply that the sum of all individual differences and partner experiences exert their influence on relationship quality via a person’s own relationship-specific experiences, and effects due to moderation by individual differences and moderation by partner-reports may be quite small. Finally, relationship-quality change (i.e., increases or decreases in relationship quality over the course of a study) was largely unpredictable from any combination of self-report variables. This collective effort should guide future models of relationships.



中文翻译:

机器学习发现了43个纵向夫妇研究中最可靠的自我报告关系质量预测指标。

鉴于关系质量对健康和福祉的强大影响,关系科学的中心任务是解释为什么某些浪漫关系比其他婚姻更繁荣。这个使用机器学习(即随机森林)的大型项目的目的是:1)量化可预测关系质量的程度,以及2)识别可可靠预测关系质量的结构。在来自29个实验室的43个二进制纵向数据集中,关系质量的最高特定于关系的预测变量是感知伙伴的承诺,欣赏,性满意度,感知伙伴的满意度和冲突。个人差异最高的预测指标是生活满意度,负面影响,抑郁,避免依恋和依恋焦虑。总体,特定于关系的变量在基线时预测最多有45%的方差,在每个研究结束时最多可以预测18%的方差。个体差异也表现良好(分别为21%和12%)。参与者报告的变量(即,自己的特定于关系的和个人差异的变量)预测的方差是伙伴报告的变量(即,伙伴对这些变量的评级)的两倍到四倍。重要的是,个体差异和合作伙伴报告仅凭演员报告的关系特定变量没有任何预测作用。这些发现表明,所有个体差异和伴侣经历的总和会通过一个人自己的特定于关系的经历而对关系质量产生影响,而且由于个人差异和合作伙伴报告而受到的影响可能很小。最后,从自我报告变量的任何组合中,人际关系质量的变化(即,在研究过程中人际关系质量的增减)在很大程度上是不可预测的。这种集体努力应该指导未来的关系模型。

更新日期:2020-08-11
down
wechat
bug