当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ecol. Econ. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Nature Based Solutions for Climate Adaptation - Paying Farmers for Flood Control
Ecological Economics ( IF 7 ) Pub Date : 2021-01-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106705
Marianne Zandersen , Jakob Stoktoft Oddershede , Anders Branth Pedersen , Helle Ørsted Nielsen , Mette Termansen

Abstract Climate change is expected to lead to more frequent and severe fluvial flood events in Northern Europe. Nature Based Solutions are increasingly recognised as a natural insurance against flood risks in vulnerable areas. This requires collaboration at landscape scale between providers and beneficiaries of flood control. In particular, mechanisms to incentivise owners of land could potentially offer cost-effective ways to reduce damage to urban infrastructure. We conduct a choice experiment among farmers located in the vicinity of a river to assess their willingness to accept a contract that would allow a local Danish municipality to periodically flood farmland to reduce urban flood risks. Results indicate that farmers on average are hesitant about entering into abatement contracts, especially if they have prior experience of crop losses due to extreme weather events. If they were to agree on a contract they would prefer a separate compensation for lost crops; a collective negotiation and higher rather than lower yearly payments. Surprisingly, data did not show a significant preference for or against a requirement to grow flood resistant crops. The results suggest that a contract with a separate damage compensation and based on individual negotiation would on average require an annual payment of 290Euro/ha for farmers with no prior experience of crop losses and 469Euro/ha for farmers who have experienced crop losses. The paper discusses the potentials and limitations of landscape scale Nature Based Solutions for climate adaptation.

中文翻译:

基于自然的气候适应解决方案 - 支付农民的防洪费用

摘要 气候变化预计将导致北欧更频繁、更严重的河流洪水事件。基于自然的解决方案越来越被认为是抵御脆弱地区洪水风险的自然保险。这需要洪水控制的提供者和受益者之间在景观范围内进行协作。特别是,激励土地所有者的机制可能会提供具有成本效益的方法来减少对城市基础设施的破坏。我们在河流附近的农民中进行了一项选择实验,以评估他们是否愿意接受允许丹麦当地市政当局定期淹没农田以降低城市洪水风险的合同。结果表明,农民平均对签订减排合同犹豫不决,尤其是如果他们有过因极端天气事件而导致作物损失的经验。如果他们就合同达成一致,他们更愿意对损失的作物进行单独补偿;集体谈判和更高而不是更低的年度付款。令人惊讶的是,数据并未显示出对种植抗洪作物的要求的明显偏好或反对。结果表明,一份单独的损害赔偿合同和基于个人谈判的合同平均需要为之前没有作物损失经验的农民支付 290 欧元/公顷的费用,为经历过作物损失的农民支付 469 欧元/公顷的费用。本文讨论了景观尺度自然气候适应解决方案的潜力和局限性。如果他们就合同达成一致,他们更愿意对损失的作物进行单独补偿;集体谈判和更高而不是更低的年度付款。令人惊讶的是,数据并未显示出对种植抗洪作物的要求的明显偏好或反对。结果表明,一份单独的损害赔偿合同和基于个人谈判的合同平均需要为之前没有作物损失经验的农民支付 290 欧元/公顷的费用,为经历过作物损失的农民支付 469 欧元/公顷的费用。本文讨论了景观尺度自然气候适应解决方案的潜力和局限性。如果他们就合同达成一致,他们更愿意对损失的作物进行单独补偿;集体谈判和更高而不是更低的年度付款。令人惊讶的是,数据并未显示出对种植抗洪作物的要求的明显偏好或反对。结果表明,一份单独的损害赔偿合同和基于个人谈判的合同平均需要为之前没有作物损失经验的农民支付 290 欧元/公顷的费用,为经历过作物损失的农民支付 469 欧元/公顷的费用。本文讨论了景观尺度自然气候适应解决方案的潜力和局限性。数据并未显示对种植抗洪作物的要求有明显的偏好或反对。结果表明,一份单独的损害赔偿合同和基于个人谈判的合同平均需要为之前没有作物损失经验的农民支付 290 欧元/公顷的费用,为经历过作物损失的农民支付 469 欧元/公顷的费用。本文讨论了景观尺度自然气候适应解决方案的潜力和局限性。数据并未显示对种植抗洪作物的要求有明显的偏好或反对。结果表明,一份单独的损害赔偿合同和基于个人谈判的合同平均需要为之前没有作物损失经验的农民支付 290 欧元/公顷的费用,为经历过作物损失的农民支付 469 欧元/公顷的费用。本文讨论了景观尺度自然气候适应解决方案的潜力和局限性。
更新日期:2021-01-01
down
wechat
bug