This paper highlights the colonized perspective, and aims to reflect on the consequences of a predominant perspective of land control and use for Amazonian indigenous people. The demarcation of indigenous territories has been presented by external public actors, the ‘Others’ to explicitly support indigenous people defend their territories. However, demarcation effectively creates a frontier and enclosure which contribute to alienate indigenous people within their new territories. Amazonian groups normally maintain that they belong to the Land, and their historical use of a determined land has been asserted by anthropological studies. But they belong to Land. In contrast, occupying a territory to generate profit allows the exploitation of everything inside it. Every form of extraction helps to reproduce the colonial logic. A key question we need to address is, therefore: Why do the ‘others’ not feel that belonging?

本文着重介绍了殖民化的观点，旨在反思以土地控制和使用为亚马逊土著人民的主要观点的后果。外部公共行为体已经提出了对土著领土的划分，“其他”是为了明确支持土著人民捍卫自己的领土。但是，分界有效地创造了边界和围墙，有助于疏远新领土内的土著人民。亚马孙群体通常认为自己属于该土地，人类学研究断言他们对确定土地的历史使用。但是他们属于土地。相反，占领一个领土以产生利润可以利用其中的一切。每种提取形式都有助于重现殖民地逻辑。