Some of the solutions reported in a recent paper (Akyol and Baykasoglu in J Intell Manuf 30(2):557–573, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1262-6) are infeasible, jeopardising the conclusion that “best results for the 75% of the 320 test instances for the ALWABP-2” were obtained. In this note, we explore the contributions of the paper, show that some of the solutions are indeed infeasible and point out possible inconsistencies in the employed heuristic that may be causing this issue.

中文翻译：

---

注释：基于多规则的构造性随机搜索算法，用于解决装配线工人的分配和平衡问题

最近一篇论文中报道的一些解决方案（Akyol和Baykasoglu在J Intell Manuf 30（2）：557–573，2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1262-6）都是不可行的，危及了得出的结论是“在320个ALWABP-2测试实例中有75％的最佳结果”。在本说明中，我们探索了本文的贡献，表明某些解决方案确实不可行，并指出了可能导致此问题的使用启发式方法可能存在的不一致之处。