The effect of droplet conductivity on electrocoalescence phenomena is studied experimentally for droplet-in-oil system in an anchored drop setup. Phase diagrams representing the coalescence/non-coalescence behaviour under DC electric field are constructed for three different droplet conductivities. Variation in droplet conductivity and separation distance between droplets do not influence critical electrocapillary number. The critical electrocapillary number varies with oil viscosity. Non-coalescence is not observed for low conductivity (1.5 $\mu$S/cm) droplets for entire range of $s_0/R$ (initial separation gap to radius ratio), therefore cone angle criteria (Bird et al., 2009) does not apply to anchored droplet-in-oil systems. Non-coalescence is observed as bridge vaporization/gas generation due to high current for high $s_0/R$ in case of moderate conductivity (1244 $\mu$S/cm) droplets and low $s_0/R$ for high conductivity (89,500 $\mu$S/cm) droplets. In addition to coalescence and non-coalescence events, subsequent events after first non-coalescence are studied and an effort is made to explain and categorize the behaviour under different regimes.

在固定液滴设置中，通过油中液滴系统实验研究了液滴电导率对电聚结现象的影响。针对三种不同的液滴电导率，构造了表示直流电场下的聚结/非聚结行为的相图。液滴电导率和液滴之间的分离距离的变化不会影响临界电毛细管数。临界电毛细管数随油的粘度而变化。低电导率未观察到非聚结（1.5 $\mu$S / cm）的液滴在整个范围内 $s_0/\mathrm{[R}$（初始分离间隙与半径之比），因此锥角标准（Bird等，2009）不适用于锚固油滴系统。观察到非聚结是由于高电流，高电流导致桥汽化/气体产生$s_0/\mathrm{[R}$ 如果电导率中等（1244 $\mu$S / cm）液滴且低 $s_0/\mathrm{[R}$ 高导电率（89,500 $\mu$S / cm）小滴。除了合并和非合并事件之外，还研究了第一个非合并之后的后续事件，并努力解释和分类了不同机制下的行为。