This article proposes applying the preference-ranking organization method for enrichment of evaluations (PROMETHEE) II in the selection of the optimal solution and ranking of selected methods for underpinning foundations. Analysis of the selected foundation-underpinning methods was based on a complex decision-making problem that included aspects of the three pillars of sustainable development, and it was extended to include technological and constructional criteria. The study used the following criteria for assessing proposed variants: price, bearing capacity, noise and vibrations, necessary equipment, necessary excavations under final structure, failure rates, and necessary foundation shoring. Analysis using the PROMETHEE II method allowed for identifying strengths and weaknesses of selected methods for underpinning foundations. The PROMETHEE II method enabled to create a ranking of foundation-underpinning methods. Jet-grouting and root-pile methods were the highest scorers in this ranking and those that fulfilled the identified criteria to the greatest extent. Moreover, analysis showed that the PROMETHEE II method was useful in solving problems of choice in the construction industry.

中文翻译：

---

使用 PROMETHEE II 方法选择用于支撑基础的最佳方法

本文提出将偏好排序组织方法用于丰富评估（PROMETHEE）II 用于最佳解决方案的选择和用于支撑基础的所选方法的排序。对选定的基础支撑方法的分析是基于一个复杂的决策问题，其中包括可持续发展的三大支柱的各个方面，并扩展到包括技术和建筑标准。该研究使用以下标准来评估提议的变体：价格、承载能力、噪音和振动、必要的设备、最终结构下的必要开挖、故障率和必要的基础支撑。使用 PROMETHEE II 方法进行的分析允许确定用于支撑基础的选定方法的优势和劣势。PROMETHEE II 方法能够创建基础支撑方法的排名。喷射灌浆法和根桩法是该排名中得分最高的方法，并且在最大程度上满足了确定的标准。此外，分析表明 PROMETHEE II 方法可用于解决建筑行业的选择问题。