Abstract In this study, the tribocorrosion behavior of an AISI 316 stainless steel (passive) and a Low-Alloyed steel (non-passivating or active) was compared, evaluating also the influence of electrolyte agitation. Unidirectional ball-on-disc tests were performed in synthetic seawater with the Zero Resistant Ammeter technique. The differences on the currents registered for both materials evinced the high rate dissolution of the active steel even in the absence of sliding, while the AISI showed negligible electrochemical activity. The results showed little influence on the agitation for the passive material, but a considerable effect on the wear-accelerated corrosion in the unworn surface of the non-passivating steel.

中文翻译：

---

钝化与非钝化材料摩擦腐蚀行为的比较及搅拌影响的评估

摘要 在这项研究中，比较了 AISI 316 不锈钢（钝化）和低合金钢（非钝化或活性）的摩擦腐蚀行为，还评估了电解液搅拌的影响。使用零电阻电流表技术在合成海水中进行了单向球盘测试。两种材料记录的电流差异表明，即使在没有滑动的情况下，活性钢也能高速溶解，而 AISI 的电化学活性可以忽略不计。结果表明，对钝化材料的搅拌影响不大，但对非钝化钢未磨损表面的磨损加速腐蚀有显着影响。