The authors of the preceding Comment [P.~Kumar and K.~Snizhko, preceding Comment, Phys. Rev. A , ] made two critical remarks regarding the protocol for detecting and quantifying quantumness of separable states presented in our paper [M.~A. Hunt et al, Phys. Rev. A 100, 022321 (2019)]. One is that our protocol is not `experiment friendly’ in comparison to full quantum state tomography. The other is that the suggested quantifier fails to distinguish different degrees of quantumness within the family of Werner states. We will show below that, while being technically correct, both remarks referred to generalizations of our protocol which had been neither suggested nor intended. We will reiterate why the proposed protocol would be advantageous, as compared to full or partial quantum state tomography, for detecting and quantifying discord in bipartite states.

中文翻译：

---

回复“关于'如何通过相关性观察和量化量子失调态的评论'”

先前评论的作者[P.〜Kumar和K.〜Snizhko，先前的评论，物理学。[Rev. A，]对我们的论文[M.〜A。]中提出的关于检测和量化可分离态的量子度的协议作了两个批判性评论。Hunt等，物理学。Rev. A 100，022321（2019）]。一是与全量子状态层析成像相比，我们的协议不是“实验友好”的。另一个是建议的量词未能区分Werner状态族内不同程度的量子。我们将在下面显示，尽管在技术上是正确的，但这两个评论均指我们的协议的概括，既没有提出也没有打算。我们将重申为什么与完整或部分量子状态层析成像相比，拟议的协议会更具优势，