当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Group authorships in Cochrane had low compliance with Cochrane recommendations.
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine ( IF 7.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-06-18 , DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12396
Mikkel Zola Andersen 1, 2 , Siv Fonnes 1, 2 , Kristoffer Andresen 1, 2 , Jacob Rosenberg 1, 2
Affiliation  

OBJECTIVE Recently, group authorships have become more common. Group authorship describes a situation where the name of a group of people is included in the byline of an article. Historically, however, group authorships have been associated with citation errors and difficulties identifying who could be regarded as an author. Cochrane is a collaboration that publishes high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses and transparency in authorship should be high. Group authorships in Cochrane have not previously been examined. This study aimed to describe group authorships in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR). METHODS In total, 8396 reviews from the CDSR were screened for group authorships from inception to 31 December 2019. Data from group authorships were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS A total of 41 reviews with group authorships were included. Almost half of group authorships (46%, 19/41) were published from 2015 to 2019. Median number of group members was 32 (range 6-91). Median publication time (protocol to review) of group authorships was 3.1 years. Of all group authorships, 39% met ICMJE's first authorship criterion, 41% met the second, and 12% met the third criterion. For only two studies all authors met the three authorship criteria. CONCLUSION A low prevalence of group authorships existed in Cochrane reviews. Reviews with group authorships took median three years to publish, and very few of group authorships in Cochrane complied with the ICMJE authorship criteria.

中文翻译:

Cochrane中的团体作者对Cochrane建议的遵守程度较低。

目的最近,团体作者身份变得越来越普遍。组作者身份描述了一种情况,其中一组人的名字包含在文章的下划线中。但是,从历史上看,团体作者身份与引文错误和确定谁可以被视为作者的困难有关。Cochrane是一个合作组织,可以发布高质量的系统评价和荟萃分析,并且作者的透明度也应该很高。以前未检查过Cochrane中的小组作者身份。这项研究旨在描述Cochrane系统评价数据库(CDSR)中的小组作者身份。方法从成立到2019年12月31日,共筛选了来自CDSR的8396条评论的小组作者。对小组作者的数据进行了提取和分析。结果总共纳入了41条具有小组作者身份的评论。从2015年到2019年,几乎有一半的团体作者发表了论文(46%,19/41)。团体成员的中位数为32(6-91)。小组作者发表的中位时间(根据协议审查)为3.1年。在所有小组作者中,有39%符合ICMJE的第一个作者标准,41%符合第二个作者资格,12%符合第三个作者资格。只有两项研究的所有作者都符合这三个作者标准。结论在Cochrane评价中,团体作者的流行率很低。具有小组作者身份的评论用了三年的时间才发表,而Cochrane中的小组作者身份很少符合ICMJE作者标准。小组作者发表的中位时间(根据协议审查)为3.1年。在所有小组作者中,有39%符合ICMJE的第一个作者标准,41%符合第二个作者资格,12%符合第三个作者资格。只有两项研究的所有作者都符合这三个作者标准。结论在Cochrane评价中,团体作者的流行率很低。具有小组作者资格的评论平均用了三年时间才发表,而且Cochrane中很少有小组作者符合ICMJE作者标准。小组作者发表的中位时间(根据协议审查)为3.1年。在所有小组作者中,有39%符合ICMJE的第一个作者标准,41%符合第二个作者资格,12%符合第三个作者资格。只有两项研究的所有作者都符合这三个作者标准。结论在Cochrane评价中,团体作者的流行率很低。具有小组作者资格的评论平均用了三年时间才发表,而且Cochrane中的小组作者资格很少符合ICMJE作者资格标准。结论在Cochrane评价中,团体作者的流行率很低。具有小组作者身份的评论用了三年的时间才发表,而Cochrane中的小组作者身份很少符合ICMJE作者标准。结论在Cochrane评价中,团体作者的流行率很低。具有小组作者资格的评论平均用了三年时间才发表,而且Cochrane中的小组作者资格很少符合ICMJE作者资格标准。
更新日期:2020-06-18
down
wechat
bug