In this paper, the impact of the Bologna reform is analyzed based on differences in scientific publication performance among the Ph.D. graduates that enrolled into doctoral study programs before the implementation of the Bologna reform in Slovenia (the pre-Bologna Ph.D. graduates) and those that enrolled after (the post-Bologna Ph.D. graduates). The transition between programs was not immediate; in Slovenia, the first Ph.D. students of the Bologna doctoral study programs were enrolled in the 2005/06 academic year, while the last academic year in which it was still possible to enroll into the pre-Bologna program was 2009/10. For Slovenian Ph.D. graduates from the 2007–2016 period, their publication records from 2 years prior to their Ph.D. theses defense to 2 years after are used for the analysis. Four indicators of their scientific publication performance are analyzed and compared: productivity, collaboration, internationality, and independence—each of them capturing a different aspect of the graduates’ research activities. The results show that there is no significant difference in the average productivity and collaboration between the post-Bologna Ph.D. graduates and the pre-Bologna Ph.D. graduates, while the values for both groups in both indicators are unexpectedly notably decreasing over the years. In contrast, internationality and independence are more constant, in general, whereas the differences between the two researched groups of Ph.D. graduates are more visible. Therefore, we conclude that the Bologna reform has a significant impact on the scientific publication performance of Ph.D. graduates, as there are notable differences in the pre-Bologna and the post-Bologna Ph.D. graduates’ performance.

中文翻译：

---

博洛尼亚改革对博士科学出版绩效的影响 毕业生——以斯洛文尼亚为例

在本文中，博洛尼亚改革的影响基于博士之间的科学出版表现差异进行分析。斯洛文尼亚博洛尼亚改革实施前就读博士生项目的毕业生（博洛尼亚博士前毕业生）和博洛尼亚改革实施后的博士生（博洛尼亚后博士生）。程序之间的转换不是立即的；在斯洛文尼亚，第一个博士。博洛尼亚博士研究项目的学生是在 2005/06 学年注册的，而最后一个学年仍然可以注册博洛尼亚预科项目是在 2009/10 学年。斯洛文尼亚博士 2007-2016 年期间的毕业生，他们在获得博士学位之前 2 年的出版记录。论文答辩至2年后用于分析。分析和比较了他们科学出版物表现的四个指标：生产力、协作、国际性和独立性——每个指标都反映了毕业生研究活动的不同方面。结果表明，博洛尼亚博士后的平均生产力和协作没有显着差异。毕业生和博洛尼亚博士前 毕业生，而这两个指标中两组的值都出人意料地在过去几年中显着下降。相比之下，国际性和独立性总体上更加稳定，而两个博士研究群体之间的差异则更加明显。毕业生更显眼。因此，我们得出结论，博洛尼亚改革对博士的科学出版表现有显着影响。毕业生，因为博洛尼亚之前和博洛尼亚之后的博士之间存在显着差异。毕业生的表现。