Abstract We show that the data of external quantum efficiency (EQE) reported in the paper in title are measured at illuminated metal front contacts and the data of external reflectance (R) reported in the same paper are measured at not illuminated metal front contacts. Such inconsistency prevents the simulation programs Quokka 2 and PC1D from fitting the reported EQE-data by using the R-data reported in the paper in title. The reported EQE-data can be fitted by using an effective reflectance including the reflectance of metal front contacts. The need of determining curves of effective reflectance can be avoided by providing EQE- and R-curves that are consistent with each other.

中文翻译：

---

评“迈向高效工业p型单晶硅PERC太阳能电池”【太阳能材料与太阳能电池第204期，2020年1月，110202】

摘要 我们表明，标题论文中报道的外量子效率 (EQE) 数据是在有光照的金属前触点处测量的，而同一论文中报道的外反射率 (R) 数据是在未光照的金属前触点处测量的。这种不一致会阻止模拟程序 Quokka 2 和 PC1D 使用标题论文中报告的 R 数据拟合报告的 EQE 数据。报告的 EQE 数据可以通过使用有效反射率（包括金属前触点的反射率）来拟合。通过提供相互一致的 EQE 和 R 曲线，可以避免确定有效反射率曲线的需要。