Quantitatively evaluating the psychological and perceptual effects of objects is an important issue, but is difficult. In cognitive studies, the psychological potential field (PPF), which represents psychological intensities in vision and can be calculated by applying computational algorithms to digital images, may help with this issue. Although studies have reported using the PPF to evaluate psychological effects, such as impressions, detailed investigations on how the PPF represents psychological perception and its limitations have not yet been performed. Another relevant tool is the fixation map, which visualizes human eye fixations; this map is generated from actual measurements acquired by eye-tracking and does not represent psychological effects directly. Although the PPF and the fixation map are based on visual imaging, they have never been compared. In this paper, we do so for the first time, using psychological and perceptual properties of line-drawing images. The results demonstrate the difference between these methods, including their representation of different properties with respect to visual perception. Moreover, the similarity between the two methods highlights the possibility of assessing perceptual phenomena such as categorization and cognition of objects based on human vision.

中文翻译：

---

二元线条画图像的心理潜能场和人眼注视：对比实验研究

量化评估对象的心理和感知效果是一个重要的问题，但是很困难。在认知研究中，代表视觉视觉强度并可以通过将计算算法应用于数字图像进行计算的心理潜能场（PPF）可能有助于解决此问题。尽管有研究报道使用PPF来评估心理效果，例如印象，但是尚未进行有关PPF如何代表心理感知及其局限性的详细研究。另一个相关工具是注视图，该图可视化人眼注视。该地图是通过眼动追踪获得的实际测量结果生成的，并不直接代表心理影响。尽管PPF和注视图基于视觉成像，他们从未被比较过。在本文中，我们是第一次使用线条描画图像的心理和知觉属性来执行此操作。结果证明了这些方法之间的差异，包括它们在视觉感知方面的不同属性表示。此外，这两种方法之间的相似性凸显了根据人类视觉评估感知现象（例如对象的分类和认知）的可能性。