当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Quat. Res.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Radiocarbon simulation fails to support the temporal synchroneity requirement of the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis
Quaternary Research ( IF 2.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-13 , DOI: 10.1017/qua.2019.83 Ian A. Jorgeson , Ryan P. Breslawski , Abigail E. Fisher
Quaternary Research ( IF 2.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-13 , DOI: 10.1017/qua.2019.83 Ian A. Jorgeson , Ryan P. Breslawski , Abigail E. Fisher
Fine-scale temporal processes, such as the synchronous deposition of organic materials, can be challenging to identify using 14 C datasets. While some events, such as volcanic eruptions, leave clear evidence for synchronous deposition, synchroneity is more difficult to establish for other types of events. This has been a source of controversy regarding 14 C dates associated with a hypothesized extraterrestrial impact at the Younger Dryas Boundary (YDB). To address this controversy, we first aggregate 14 C measurements from Northern Hemisphere YDB sites. We also aggregate 14 C measurements associated with a known synchronous event, the Laacher See volcanic eruption. We then use a Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate the magnitude of variability expected in a 14 C dataset associated with a synchronous event. The simulation accounts for measurement error, calibration uncertainty, “old wood” effects, and laboratory measurement biases. The Laacher See 14 C dataset is consistent with expectations of synchroneity generated by the simulation. However, the YDB 14 C dataset is inconsistent with the simulated expectations for synchroneity. These results suggest that a central requirement of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis, synchronous global deposition of a YDB layer, is extremely unlikely, calling into question the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis more generally.
中文翻译:
放射性碳模拟无法支持新仙女木撞击假说的时间同步性要求
精细的时间过程,例如有机材料的同步沉积,可能难以识别使用14 C 数据集。虽然一些事件,如火山爆发,为同步沉积留下了明确的证据,但其他类型的事件更难建立同步性。这一直是争议的根源14 C 日期与新仙女木边界 (YDB) 的假设外星撞击有关。为了解决这个争议,我们首先汇总14 来自北半球 YDB 站点的 C 测量值。我们也聚合14 与已知的同步事件 Laacher See 火山喷发相关的 C 测量值。然后,我们使用蒙特卡罗模拟来评估预期的变化幅度14 与同步事件关联的 C 数据集。模拟考虑了测量误差、校准不确定性、“老木头”效应和实验室测量偏差。拉赫见14 C 数据集与模拟生成的同步性预期一致。然而,YDB14 C 数据集与模拟的同步预期不一致。这些结果表明,Younger Dryas 撞击假说的核心要求,即 YDB 层的同步全球沉积是极不可能的,这对更普遍的 Younger Dryas 撞击假说提出了质疑。
更新日期:2020-02-13
中文翻译:
放射性碳模拟无法支持新仙女木撞击假说的时间同步性要求
精细的时间过程,例如有机材料的同步沉积,可能难以识别使用