当前位置: X-MOL 学术Environ. Entomol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparative Trap Catches of Male Bactrocera, Dacus, and Zeugodacus Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) With Four Floral Phenylbutanoid Lures (Anisyl Acetone, Cue-Lure, Raspberry Ketone, and Zingerone) in Queensland, Australia
Environmental Entomology ( IF 1.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-06-09 , DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvaa056
Jane E Royer 1 , Keng Hong Tan 2 , David G Mayer 1
Affiliation  

The male fruit fly attractants, cue-lure (CL) and raspberry ketone (RK), are important in pest management. These volatile phenylbutanoids occur in daciniphilous Bulbophyllum Thouar (Orchidaceae: Asparagales) orchids, along with zingerone (ZN) and anisyl acetone (AA). While these four compounds attract a similar range of species, their relative attractiveness to multiple species is unknown. We field tested these compounds in two fruit fly speciose locations in north Queensland, Australia (Lockhart and Cairns) for 8 wk. Of 16 species trapped in significant numbers, 14 were trapped with CL and RK, all in significantly greater numbers with CL traps than RK traps (at least in higher population locations). This included the pest species Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae) (CL catches ca. 5× > RK), Bactrocera neohumeralis (Hardy) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Bactrocera bryoniae (Tryon) (Diptera: Tephritidae) (CL catches ca. 3× > RK), and Bactrocera frauenfeldi (Schiner) (Diptera: Tephritidae) (in Cairns-CL catches ca. 1.6× > RK). Seven species were trapped with AA, and all were also caught in CL and RK traps in significantly greater numbers, with the exception of B. frauenfeldi. For this species, catches were not statistically different with CL, RK, and AA in Lockhart, and RK and AA in Cairns. Seven species were trapped with ZN, two at this lure only, and the remainder also with CL or RK but in significantly greater numbers. This is the first quantitative comparison of the relative attractiveness of CL, RK, AA, and ZN against multiple species, and supports the long-held but untested assumption that CL is broadly more attractive lure than RK.

中文翻译:

澳大利亚昆士兰州雄性实蝇、Dacus 和 Zeugodacus 果蝇(双翅目:Tephritidae)与四种花卉苯丁酸诱饵(茴香丙酮、Cue-Lure、覆盆子酮和姜酮)的比较捕获量

雄性果蝇引诱剂、线索诱饵 (CL) 和覆盆子酮 (RK) 在害虫管理中很重要。这些挥发性苯基丁烷存在于 daciniphilous Bulbophyllum Thouar(兰花科:Asparagales)兰花中,还有姜油酮 (ZN) 和茴香丙酮 (AA)。虽然这四种化合物吸引的物种范围相似,但它们对多种物种的相对吸引力尚不清楚。我们在澳大利亚昆士兰北部(洛克哈特和凯恩斯)的两个果蝇特异产地对这些化合物进行了 8 周的现场测试。在大量被困的 16 种物种中,有 14 种被 CL 和 RK 困住,使用 CL 陷阱的数量都比 RK 陷阱多得多(至少在人口较多的地区)。这包括害虫种类 Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt)(双翅目:Tephritidae)(CL 捕获量约 5×> RK),Bactrocera neohumeralis (Hardy) (双翅目:实蝇科) 和 Bactrocera bryoniae (Tryon) (双翅目:实蝇科) (CL catches ca. 3x > RK),和 Bactrocera frauenfeldi (Schiner) (双翅目:Tephritidae) (in catches Cairns) . 1.6× > RK)。七个物种被 AA 捕获,除 B. frauenfeldi 外,所有物种也被 CL 和 RK 陷阱捕获,数量明显更多。对于该物种,Lockhart 的 CL、RK 和 AA 以及凯恩斯的 RK 和 AA 的捕获量在统计上没有差异。七个物种被 ZN 捕获,两个仅在这种诱饵上,其余的也用 CL 或 RK,但数量明显更多。这是 CL、RK、AA 和 ZN 对多个物种的相对吸引力的首次定量比较,
更新日期:2020-06-09
down
wechat
bug