OBJECTIVE Research suggests distinct criminal risk factors, not mental illness, are more strongly associated with most criminal behaviors. This notion has been supported among inpatient persons with mental illness (PMI) when examining antisocial cognitions; however, other key criminogenic risk factors (the Big Four and Central Eight risk factors) have not been examined among psychiatric inpatient PMI. HYPOTHESES We hypothesized that criminal justice (CJ)-involved PMI would endorse significantly greater criminogenic risk compared to non-CJ-involved PMI and that these risk factors would significantly and accurately identify whether PMI had CJ involvement. Additionally, we hypothesized that PMI with and without a history of CJ involvement would not significantly differ on their reported psychiatric symptomatology. METHOD We examined all Central Eight criminal risk factors and psychiatric symptomatology among psychiatric inpatient PMI (N = 142) with (n = 74) and without (n = 68) CJ involvement histories. RESULTS Multivariate analysis of variance and discriminant function analysis indicated significant differences between the Big Four and Central Eight criminal risk factors when classifying CJ and non-CJ groups. The Big Four risk factors correctly classified 85.9% of participants, and the Central Eight correctly classified 99.3% of participants into CJ and non-CJ groups; however, psychiatric symptoms only correctly classified 57.7% of participants into CJ and non-CJ groups. CONCLUSIONS Criminal risk factors appear to be more strongly associated with CJ involvement among PMI than psychiatric symptomatology; therefore, psychotherapeutic intervention on criminal risk factors, not only mental illness, may decrease criminal recidivism among CJ-involved PMI. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

有和没有刑事司法参与的精神病住院患者的犯罪风险因素和精神病学症状的比较。

目的 研究表明，与大多数犯罪行为更密切相关的是不同的犯罪风险因素，而不是精神疾病。在检查反社会认知时，精神疾病住院患者 (PMI) 支持这一观点；然而，尚未在精神病住院患者 PMI 中检查其他关键的犯罪风险因素（四大和中央八项风险因素）。假设我们假设与不涉及 CJ 的 PMI 相比，涉及刑事司法 (CJ) 的 PMI 会认可更大的犯罪风险，并且这些风险因素将显着且准确地确定 PMI 是否涉及 CJ。此外，我们假设有和没有 CJ 受累史的 PMI 在其报告的精神症状方面不会有显着差异。方法 我们检查了有 (n = 74) 和没有 (n = 68) CJ 受累史的精神病住院患者 PMI（N = 142）中的所有中央八项犯罪危险因素和精神病学症状。结果 多元方差分析和判别函数分析表明，在对 CJ 和非 CJ 群体进行分类时，四大和中央八项犯罪风险因素之间存在显着差异。四大风险因素正确分类85.9%的参与者，中央八项正确分类99.3%的参与者为CJ和非CJ组；然而，精神症状仅将 57.7% 的参与者正确分类为 CJ 和非 CJ 组。结论 与精神病学症状相比，犯罪风险因素似乎与 PMI 中 CJ 的参与更密切相关；所以，对犯罪危险因素的心理治疗干预，不仅是精神疾病，可能会减少 CJ 涉及的 PMI 的犯罪再犯。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2020 APA，保留所有权利）。