当前位置: X-MOL 学术Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Physiological Modeling and Simulation-Validation, Credibility, and Application.
Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering ( IF 9.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-06-05 , DOI: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-082219-051740
W Andrew Pruett 1 , John S Clemmer 1 , Robert L Hester 1, 2
Affiliation  

In this review, we discuss the science of model validation as it applies to physiological modeling. There is widespread disagreement and ambiguity about what constitutes model validity. In areas in which models affect real-world decision-making, including within the clinic, in regulatory science, or in the design and engineering of novel therapeutics, this question is of critical importance. Without an answer, it impairs the usefulness of models and casts a shadow over model credibility in all domains. To address this question, we examine the use of nonmathematical models in physiological research, in medical practice, and in engineering to see how models in other domains are used and accepted. We reflect on historic physiological models and how they have been presented to the scientific community. Finally, we look at various validation frameworks that have been proposed as potential solutions during the past decade.

中文翻译:


生理建模与仿真——验证、可信度和应用。

在这篇评论中,我们讨论了模型验证的科学,因为它适用于生理建模。关于模型有效性的构成存在广泛的分歧和模棱两可。在模型影响现实世界决策的领域,包括临床、监管科学或新型疗法的设计和工程,这个问题至关重要。如果没有答案,它会削弱模型的有用性,并给所有领域的模型可信度蒙上阴影。为了解决这个问题,我们研究了非数学模型在生理研究、医学实践和工程中的使用,以了解其他领域中的模型是如何被使用和接受的。我们反思历史生理模型以及它们是如何呈现给科学界的。最后,

更新日期:2020-06-05
down
wechat
bug