Correspondence Fiona L. Calvert, School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Northfields Clinic, Building 22, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia. Email: flc161@uowmail.edu.au Abstract Objective: This study aimed to explore the experiences of supervisees who completed a metacommunication intervention in supervision. Methods: Forty-eight supervisees completed the supervisory intervention and gave post-intervention written feedback. Their responses were thematically analysed. Results: Overall, supervisees responded positively to the intervention, with high willingness to engage in metacommunication again in supervision. Thematic analysis of the reflective written responses completed post-intervention revealed a rich array of supervisee experiences of the metacommunication exercise. Supervisees spoke of anticipated/intended impacts on supervision and their therapy practice, including: greater depth of reflection, attending to parallel process, discussion of roles, increased closeness, improved openness, and increased confidence in metacommunication. In regard to challenges associated with the supervisory intervention, participants reflected on difficulties with timing, experiences of discomfort and concerns about potential negative reactions from the supervisor, and consideration of power dynamics in supervision. Conclusion: This study shows promising preliminary results of the acceptability and perceived impacts of an experiential intervention involving the use of metacommunication in supervision.

中文翻译：

---

被督导者在临床督导中进行元沟通干预的经验

通讯作者 Fiona L. Calvert，伍伦贡大学心理学学院 Northfields Clinic，Building 22, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia。电子邮件：flc161@uowmail.edu.au 摘要 目的：本研究旨在探讨完成监督元沟通干预的被监督者的经验。方法：48 名被督导者完成督导干预并给予干预后书面反馈。他们的回答进行了专题分析。结果：总体而言，被督导者对干预反应积极，在督导中再次进行元沟通的意愿较高。对干预后完成的反思性书面回复的主题分析揭示了元沟通练习中丰富的受监督者经验。被督导者谈到了对督导和他们的治疗实践的预期/预期影响，包括：更深入的反思、参与平行过程、角色讨论、增加亲密度、改善开放性以及增加对元沟通的信心。关于与监督干预相关的挑战，参与者反映了时间安排上的困难、不适的经历以及对监督的潜在负面反应的担忧，以及对监督中权力动态的考虑。结论：这项研究显示了在监督中使用元沟通的体验式干预的可接受性和感知影响的有希望的初步结果。角色的讨论，增加亲密感，提高开放性，并增加对元通信的信心。关于与监督干预相关的挑战，参与者反映了时间安排上的困难、不适的经历以及对监督的潜在负面反应的担忧，以及对监督中权力动态的考虑。结论：这项研究显示了在监督中使用元沟通的体验式干预的可接受性和感知影响的有希望的初步结果。角色的讨论，增加亲密感，提高开放性，并增加对元通信的信心。关于与监督干预相关的挑战，参与者反映了时间安排上的困难、不适的经历以及对监督的潜在负面反应的担忧，以及对监督中权力动态的考虑。结论：这项研究显示了在监督中使用元沟通的体验式干预的可接受性和感知影响的有希望的初步结果。对主管的潜在负面反应感到不适和担忧的经历，以及对主管权力动态的考虑。结论：这项研究显示了在监督中使用元沟通的体验式干预的可接受性和感知影响的有希望的初步结果。对主管的潜在负面反应感到不适和担忧的经历，以及对主管权力动态的考虑。结论：这项研究显示了在监督中使用元沟通的体验式干预的可接受性和感知影响的有希望的初步结果。