当前位置: X-MOL 学术Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
On sigma estimators for the case of M>1 subgroups and quality control S charts of varying sample sizes
Quality and Reliability Engineering International ( IF 2.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-31 , DOI: 10.1002/qre.2657
Saeed Maghsoodloo 1
Affiliation  

This article discusses the (precision and accuracy) relative efficiencies of all estimators of a normal population standard deviation σ = σX for M > 1 subgroups of different sample sizes. We have examined the statistical properties of seven estimators of σX which are (1) the pooled estimator Sp, (2) the pooled unbiased estimator σ ^ pub , (3) the maximum likelihood estimator σ ^ mle , (4) Irving W. Burr's weighted ranges, (5 and 6) the last two Burr estimators, and the author's optimal estimator σ ^ XO . Unlike the case of M = 1 subgroup, our introduction section shows that the σ ^ mle for M > 1 subgroups is the least accurate of σ estimators and should be avoided in all applications only when M > 1. As a consequence of our findings, modifications of at least two choices to control limits of S chart are provided. Part 1 of this article (Sections 1–6) compares estimators assuming a process is under statistical control, and Part 2 (Sections 7–10) discusses all statistical aspects of the S chart of varying sample sizes.

中文翻译:

关于M> 1子组的sigma估计量和不同样本量的质量控制S图

本文讨论了(精度和准确度)正常群体标准差的所有估计的相对效率σ = σ X中号> 1子组不同的样品尺寸。我们已研究的7所估计的统计特性σ X,其是(1)汇集的估计小号p,(2)汇集无偏估计 σ ^ 酒馆 ,(3)最大似然估计 σ ^ le ,(4)Irving W. Burr的加权范围,(5和6)最后两个Burr估计量,以及作者的最优估计量 σ ^ XO 。与M = 1子组的情况不同,我们的简介部分显示 σ ^ le 对于M > 1个子组,σ估计值的准确性最低,只有在M > 1的情况下才应避免在所有应用中使用。由于我们的发现,提供了至少两个选择的修改以控制S图表的限制。本文的第1部分(第1-6部分)比较假定过程受统计控制的估计量,而第2部分(第7-10部分)讨论了不同样本量的S图表的所有统计方面。
更新日期:2020-05-31
down
wechat
bug