A Fully Differential Write Assist 10T (FDWA10T) SRAM cell has been proposed in this work. The various design metrics and their behavior under severe process variation have been analyzed in this paper and have been compared with other state-of-the-art designs - FD8T, SEDF9T, BI11T, WWL12T and D12T cells. The FDWA10T cell shows \(1.47\times/1.73\times/2.09\times\) shorter \(\textit{T}_{\mathrm{RA}}\) than that of D12T/BI11T/SEDF9T and \(1.20\times/1.59\times/1.86\times/4.33\times\) shorter \(\textit{T}_{\mathrm{WA}}\) than that of D12T/WWL12T/SEDF9T/BI11T. In addition, it shows \(1.05\times\) narrower spread in \(\textit{T}_{\mathrm{RA}}\) than that of BI11T and \(3.94\times\) higher RSNM than that of FD8T. A \(4.10\times\) improvement in WSNM is also observed when compared to SEDF9T/D12T/WWL12T. The FDWA10T cell also exhibits \(1.03\times /1.03\times /1.06\times /2.09\times\) lower hold power (\(\textit{H}_{\mathrm{PWR}}\)) consumption than that of D12T/FD8T/SEDF9T/WWL12T and consumes \(1.14\times /1.26\times /1.23\times\) lesser area when compared to BI11T/WWL12T/D12T. These improvements are obtained at the cost of \(1.50\times /2.42\times\) longer \(\textit{T}_{\mathrm{RA}}\)/\(\textit{T}_{\mathrm{WA}}\) than that of FD8T, \(6.4\times\) higher \(\textit{H}_{\mathrm{PWR}}\) dissipation than that of BI11T and \(1.10\times /1.15\times\) higher area consumption than that of FD8T/SEDF9T.

这项工作中已经提出了全差分写辅助10T（FDWA10T）SRAM单元。本文分析了各种设计指标及其在严重工艺变化下的行为，并已与其他最新设计（FD8T，SEDF9T，BI11T，WWL12T和D12T电池）进行了比较。FDWA10T单元格比D12T / BI11T / SEDF9T和\（1.20 \ ）短\（\ 1.47 \ times / 1.73 \ times / 2.09 \ times \）\（\ textit {T} _ {\ mathrm {RA}} \）比D12T / WWL12T / SEDF9T / BI11T缩短了\ / \ textit {T} _ {\ mathrm {WA}} \）/ 1.59 \ times / 1.86 \ times / 4.33 \ times \）。此外，它显示\（\ textit {T} _ {\ mathrm {RA}} \）中\（1.05 \ times \）的传播范围比BI11T和RSNM比FD8T高（3.94次）。甲\（4.10 \倍\）相比SEDF9T / D12T / WWL12T当WSNM改善还观察到。FDWA10T单元的消耗功率（\（\ textit {H} _ {\ mathrm {PWR}} \））比（*）低（\（1.03 \ times / 1.03 \ times / 1.06 \ times / 2.09 \ times \））与BI11T / WWL12T / D12T相比，D12T / FD8T / SEDF9T / WWL12T占用的面积要小\（1.14 \倍/1.26 \倍/1.23 \倍\）。这些改进是在成本获得\（1.50 \倍/2.42 \倍\）更长\（\ textit【T} _ {\ mathrm {RA}} \） / \（\ textit【T} _ {\ mathrm { WA}} \）比FD8T，的\（6.4 \倍\）更高\（\ textit {H} _ {\ mathrm {PWR}} \）耗散量比BI11T高，并且（1.10 \ times / 1.15 \ times \）的面积消耗比FD8T / SEDF9T高。