Veissière and colleagues make a valiant attempt at reconciling an internalist account of implicit cultural learning with an externalist account that understands social behaviour in terms of its environment-involving dynamics. However, unfortunately the author's attempt to forge a middle way between internalism and externalism fails. We argue their failure stems from the overly individualistic understanding of the perception of cultural affordances they propose.

中文翻译：

---

基于技能的参与与丰富的可供性景观，作为通过其他思想思考的替代方案

Veissière 及其同事勇敢地尝试将内隐文化学习的内部主义解释与从涉及环境的动态方面理解社会行为的外部主义解释相协调。然而，不幸的是，作者试图在内部主义和外部主义之间建立中间道路的尝试失败了。我们认为，他们的失败源于对他们提出的文化可供性感知的过度个人主义理解。