This article examines criticism from the scholarly community and findings from the military's Judicial Proceedings Panel that training in the U.S. Department of Defense Sexual Assault Prevention and Response program biases panel members during courts-martial. The topic is examined from the perspective of psychological science. Studies on jury bias, stereotypes, decision-making dynamics, and behavioral conditioning are applied to the question of whether sexual assault prevention training can bias panel members. Analysis of the subject suggests that servicemembers are subjected to a range of bias-inducing mechanisms that arise within the military context. This article concludes that expert witnesses in behavioral science should be called during courts-martial to explain how judgements may be influenced by institutional training. Reinforcing the integrity of the military justice system has implications for protecting individual liberties.

中文翻译：

---

性侵犯法院-军事期间的小组偏见。

本文探讨了来自学术界的批评和来自军事司法诉讼小组的调查结果，即美国国防部性侵犯预防和应对计划的培训在军事法庭审判期间对小组成员产生了偏见。从心理学的角度研究了这个话题。关于陪审团偏见，刻板印象，决策动态和行为条件的研究被应用于预防性侵犯培训是否可以使小组成员偏见的问题。对这个问题的分析表明，现役军人受到军事背景下产生的一系列偏见诱导机制的影响。本文的结论是，在军事法庭上应召集行为科学方面的专家证人，以解释机构培训可能如何影响判决。