This study examined the influence of same-age and mixed-age dyads on the collaborative inhibition effect (reduced recall in collaborative groups compared to the combined recall of the same number people who recall individually). Younger (age 18-25) and older (age 65+) adults recalled categorized word lists alone or in collaboration with a same-age or a different-age partner. On an initial recall test, the magnitude of collaborative inhibition for veridical recall was similar across dyads, regardless of age. However, age differences emerged in false recall as older adults were less likely to correct each other's errors than younger adults in same-age dyads. Older adults in same-age dyads continued to demonstrate greater false recall on a subsequent recall test, but there were no lasting costs of collaboration on subsequent recall or recognition for same-age or mixed-age dyads. Mixed-age dyads were more likely to provide a simple acknowledgment and less likely to remain silent in response to partner suggestions than were same-age partners, however, this did not affect the magnitude of collaborative inhibition. Any lasting effects of collaboration are invariant across same-age and mixed-age partners. The results demonstrate age-invariance of the retrieval strategy disruption theory and highlight collaborative process variables as complementary mechanisms of collaborative inhibition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

在同龄和混龄二元组中的协同抑制作用。

这项研究检查了同年龄和混合年龄的双性恋对协同抑制作用的影响（与独立回忆的相同人数的综合回忆相比，合作组的回忆减少）。年龄较小（18-25岁）和年龄较大（65岁以上）的成年人单独或与同年龄或不同年龄的伴侣一起回忆起分类词汇表。在最初的回忆测试中，不论年龄大小，跨二联体对纵向回忆的协同抑制幅度相似。然而，年龄差异在错误的回忆中出现，因为同龄双胞胎中的年轻人比年轻人更不可能纠正彼此的错误。在随后的回忆测试中，同龄双胞胎的成年人继续表现出更大的错误回忆，但是在随后的召回或承认同龄或混合年龄的二元组方面没有持久的合作成本。与同龄伴侣相比，混合年龄的双胞胎更有可能提供简单的承认，并且对伴侣的建议保持沉默的可能性较小，但是，这并不影响协同抑制的程度。合作的任何持久影响在同年龄和混合年龄的合作伙伴之间都是不变的。结果证明了检索策略破坏理论的年龄不变性，并强调了协同过程变量作为协同抑制的补充机制。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。与同龄伴侣相比，混合年龄的双胞胎更有可能提供简单的承认，并且对伴侣的建议保持沉默的可能性较小，但是，这并不影响协同抑制的程度。合作的任何持久影响在同年龄和混合年龄的合作伙伴之间都是不变的。结果证明了检索策略破坏理论的年龄不变性，并强调了协同过程变量作为协同抑制的补充机制。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。与同龄伴侣相比，混合年龄的双胞胎更有可能提供简单的承认，并且对伴侣的建议保持沉默的可能性较小，但是，这并不影响协同抑制的程度。合作的任何持久影响在同年龄和混合年龄的合作伙伴之间都是不变的。结果证明了检索策略破坏理论的年龄不变性，并强调了协同过程变量作为协同抑制的补充机制。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。结果证明了检索策略破坏理论的年龄不变性，并强调了协同过程变量作为协同抑制的补充机制。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。结果证明了检索策略破坏理论的年龄不变性，并强调了协同过程变量作为协同抑制的补充机制。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。