In this response, we address the comments by D. Bilardello on the paper by Brandt et al. (2019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016968). His main point is that the Mafra rhythmites are remagnetized as are supposed to be all Paleozoic sediments in the Paraná Basin in the context of a widespread Jurassic‐Cretaceous remagnetization in South America. In this way, the obtained results are not suitable for investigations of the paleosecular variation models. The authors do not agree with his conclusions and present counterevidence to support the approach and the conclusions of Brandt et al. (2019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016968).

中文翻译：

---

对达里奥·比拉尔德洛（Dario Bilardello）的评论：“来自巴拉那盆地（巴西南部）的宾夕法尼亚州晚古地磁新结果：最近的巨型高斯过程模型是否适用于起亚超同步？”

在此回复中，我们将介绍D. Bilardello在Brandt等人的论文中的评论。（2019，https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016968）。他的主要观点是，在南美侏罗纪-白垩纪广泛的磁化作用的背景下，Mafra节律被磁化，被认为是巴拉那盆地的所有古生代沉积物。这样，所获得的结果不适用于研究古生物变异模型。作者不同意他的结论，并提出反证证据来支持Brandt等人的方法和结论。（2019，https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016968）。