当前位置：
X-MOL 学术
›
Behav. Genet.
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A Comparison of the ASEBA Adult Self Report (ASR) and the Brief Problem Monitor (BPM/18-59).
Behavior Genetics ( IF 2.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-17 , DOI: 10.1007/s10519-020-10001-3 Lianne P de Vries 1, 2 , Margot P van de Weijer 1, 2 , Lannie Ligthart 1, 2 , Gonneke Willemsen 1, 2 , Conor V Dolan 1 , Dorret I Boomsma 1, 2, 3 , Bart M L Baselmans 4 , Meike Bartels 1, 2, 3
Behavior Genetics ( IF 2.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-17 , DOI: 10.1007/s10519-020-10001-3 Lianne P de Vries 1, 2 , Margot P van de Weijer 1, 2 , Lannie Ligthart 1, 2 , Gonneke Willemsen 1, 2 , Conor V Dolan 1 , Dorret I Boomsma 1, 2, 3 , Bart M L Baselmans 4 , Meike Bartels 1, 2, 3
Affiliation
The adult self report (ASR) is a well-validated instrument with multiple scales relating to adult psychopathology. Recently, an 18-item version has been introduced, the brief problem monitor (BPM) to measure Internalizing behavior (INT), Externalizing behavior (EXT), and attention problems (ATT). The present study compared the BPM and ASR and investigated how well the BPM can serve as a supplement or an alternative for the ASR for specific clinical and scientific purposes. In a large sample of adult twins (N = 9.835) from the Netherlands Twin Register (NTR), we compared the internal consistency, clinical classification concordance, means, and variances of the ASR and BPM. Using the classical twin design, we investigated the genetic covariance structure. For external validation, the associations between subjective well-being and different subscales of the ASR and BPM were compared. The internal consistency of the BPM scales (around α = 0.75) was somewhat lower than the ASR (α ~ 0.85). The BPM Externalizing scale showed the lowest internal consistency (α = 0.63). ASR and BPM scores showed good clinical classification concordance (0.61-0.80) and high correlations (r > 0.88). A small reversed sex difference in the BPM Externalizing scale appeared (women > men). Genetic (0.34-0.54) and environmental components (0.46-0.66) explained the variance to a similar extent for the ASR and BPM. The phenotypic and genetic associations with well-being were comparable. In situations where sum scores are sufficient, the BPM performs as well as the longer ASR. Depending on the situation and goal, it is worth considering the BPM as an alternative for the ASR to reduce the participant burden.
中文翻译：
ASEBA成人自我报告（ASR）和简短问题监视器（BPM / 18-59）的比较。
成人自我报告（ASR）是一种经过验证的工具，具有与成人心理病理学相关的多个等级。最近，引入了18个项目的版本，即简短问题监视器（BPM），用于测量内部化行为（INT），外部化行为（EXT）和注意问题（ATT）。本研究比较了BPM和ASR，并研究了BPM作为特定临床和科学目的可作为ASR的补充或替代品的程度。在来自荷兰双胞胎注册（NTR）的大量成年双胞胎样本（N = 9.835）中，我们比较了ASR和BPM的内部一致性，临床分类一致性，均值和方差。使用经典的双胞胎设计，我们研究了遗传协方差结构。对于外部验证，比较了主观幸福感与ASR和BPM不同分量表之间的关联。BPM量表的内部一致性（约α= 0.75）略低于ASR（α〜0.85）。BPM外化量表显示出最低的内部一致性（α= 0.63）。ASR和BPM评分显示出良好的临床分类一致性（0.61-0.80）和高度相关性（r> 0.88）。在BPM外部化量表中出现了小的反向性别差异（女性>男性）。遗传因素（0.34-0.54）和环境因素（0.46-0.66）解释了ASR和BPM的差异程度。表型和遗传与幸福的关联是可比的。在总和分数足够的情况下，BPM的性能和较长的ASR一样。根据情况和目标，
更新日期：2020-05-17
中文翻译：
ASEBA成人自我报告（ASR）和简短问题监视器（BPM / 18-59）的比较。
成人自我报告（ASR）是一种经过验证的工具，具有与成人心理病理学相关的多个等级。最近，引入了18个项目的版本，即简短问题监视器（BPM），用于测量内部化行为（INT），外部化行为（EXT）和注意问题（ATT）。本研究比较了BPM和ASR，并研究了BPM作为特定临床和科学目的可作为ASR的补充或替代品的程度。在来自荷兰双胞胎注册（NTR）的大量成年双胞胎样本（N = 9.835）中，我们比较了ASR和BPM的内部一致性，临床分类一致性，均值和方差。使用经典的双胞胎设计，我们研究了遗传协方差结构。对于外部验证，比较了主观幸福感与ASR和BPM不同分量表之间的关联。BPM量表的内部一致性（约α= 0.75）略低于ASR（α〜0.85）。BPM外化量表显示出最低的内部一致性（α= 0.63）。ASR和BPM评分显示出良好的临床分类一致性（0.61-0.80）和高度相关性（r> 0.88）。在BPM外部化量表中出现了小的反向性别差异（女性>男性）。遗传因素（0.34-0.54）和环境因素（0.46-0.66）解释了ASR和BPM的差异程度。表型和遗传与幸福的关联是可比的。在总和分数足够的情况下，BPM的性能和较长的ASR一样。根据情况和目标，
京公网安备 11010802027423号