In “A comparison of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for Grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: an analysis of the prospective quality outcomes database,” Chan et al¹ report a comparative study of 297 patients from a quality outcomes database where 2 types of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion were applied: traditional midline open (225 patients) and minimally invasive (72). There was a significant disparity in the numbers of patients in these 2 groups, with over 3 times the number in the open group than in the minimally invasive group. That disparity is a reflection of the current practice of spine surgery, indicating that open surgery remains the main technique employed by surgeons for the management of spondylolisthesis. Other...

中文翻译：

---

评论：1级退行性腰椎滑脱的最小侵入性和开放式经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的比较：预期质量结果数据库的分析。

Chan等在“微创手术和开放式经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗1级变性腰椎滑脱症的比较：对预期质量结果数据库的分析中”¹报告从一项质量结果数据库中对297例患者进行了比较研究，其中应用了两种类型的经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术：传统的中线开放式（225例）和微创（72例）。这两组患者的人数存在显着差异，开放型患者的数量是微创组的3倍以上。这种差异反映了当前脊柱手术的实践，表明开放手术仍然是外科医生用于治疗腰椎滑脱的主要技术。其他...