当前位置: X-MOL 学术Resp. Med. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Macrolide resistant Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease following clarithromycin and ethambutol combination therapy.
Respiratory Medicine ( IF 4.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-15 , DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106025
Yasuhiro Ito 1 , Seiichi Miwa 1 , Masahiro Shirai 1 , Miho Kanai 1 , Kaoru Fujita 1 , Hisano Ohba 1 , Eriko Iwaizumi 1 , Tomoko Oshima 1 , Suguru Kojima 1 , Takafumi Suda 2 , Hiroshi Hayakawa 1
Affiliation  

Rationale

Whether two-drug therapy (clarithromycin and ethambutol) for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease contributes to the development of macrolide-resistant MAC is unclear.

Objective

To compare the incidence of macrolide-resistant MAC between patients treated with two-drug therapy (clarithromycin and ethambutol) and the standard three-drug therapy (clarithromycin, ethambutol, and rifampicin) for MAC pulmonary disease.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 147 patients with treatment-naive MAC pulmonary disease who had received two-drug therapy (n = 47) or three-drug therapy (n = 100) between 1997 and 2016 at National Hospital Organization, Tenryu Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan. The risk of development of macrolide-resistant MAC was evaluated by calculating the cumulative incidence rate using Gray's test.

Results

The median follow-up period was 74.5 months. During the follow-up period, one of the 47 patients (2.1%) in the two-drug group developed macrolide-resistant MAC, compared to 12 of the 100 patients (12.0%) in the three-drug group. The cumulative incidence rate of macrolide-resistant MAC was lower in the two-drug group than in the three-drug group (0.0023; 95% confidence interval, 0.002 to 0.107 versus 0.200; 95% confidence interval, 0.100 to 0.324, p = 0.0593).

Conclusions

These results suggest that two-drug treatment with clarithromycin and ethambutol for MAC pulmonary disease does not lead to a higher incidence of resistance acquisition to clarithromycin than the standard three-drug treatment.



中文翻译:

克拉霉素和乙胺丁醇联合治疗后,对大环内酯类耐药的鸟分枝杆菌复杂的肺部疾病。

基本原理

鸟分枝杆菌复合物(MAC)肺部疾病的两种药物疗法(克拉霉素和乙胺丁醇)是否有助于大环内酯类耐药性MAC的发展尚不清楚。

目的

为了比较接受两种药物治疗(克拉霉素和乙胺丁醇)和标准的三种药物治疗(克拉霉素,乙胺丁醇和利福平)的MAC肺疾病患者对大环内酯类药物耐药的MAC发生率。

方法

我们回顾性分析了1997年至2016年之间在日本滨松市天龙医院的国立医院组织接受过两种药物治疗(n = 47)或三种药物治疗(n = 100)的147例初治MAC肺疾病患者。通过使用Gray检验计算累积发生率,评估了抗大环内酯类MAC发生的风险。

结果

中位随访期为74.5个月。在随访期间,两药组47例患者中有1例(2.1%)发生了大环内酯耐药的MAC,而三药组100例患者中有12例(12.0%)发生了大环内酯耐药。两药组中大环内酯类药物耐药MAC的累积发生率低于三药组(0.0023; 95%置信区间,0.002至0.107对0.200; 95%置信区间,0.100至0.324,p  = 0.0593 )。

结论

这些结果表明,与标准的三药治疗相比,使用克拉霉素和乙胺丁醇的两种药物治疗MAC肺部疾病不会导致对克拉霉素产生耐药性的发生率更高。

更新日期:2020-05-15
down
wechat
bug