当前位置: X-MOL 学术J Am Water Resour Assoc › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Analyzing the Variability of Remote Sensing and Hydrologic Model Evapotranspiration Products in a Watershed in Michigan
Journal of the American Water Resources Association ( IF 2.4 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-13 , DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12849
Matthew R. Herman 1 , A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi 1 , Juan Sebastian Hernandez‐Suarez 1 , Ali M. Sadeghi 2
Affiliation  

The goal of this paper was to statistically explore the spatiotemporal performance of remotely sensed actual evapotranspiration (ETa) datasets and a remotely sensed ensemble in a region that lacks observed data. The remotely sensed datasets were further compared with ETa results from a physically based hydrologic model (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) to examine the differences and determine the level of agreement between the ETa datasets and the model outputs. ETa datasets were compared on temporal (i.e., monthly and seasonal basis) and spatial (i.e., landuse) scales at both watershed and subbasin levels. The results showed a lack of consistent similarities and differences among the datasets when evaluating the monthly ETa variations; however, the seasonal aggregated data presented more consistent similarities and differences during the spring and summer compared to the fall and winter. Meanwhile, spatial analysis of the datasets showed the MOD16A2 500 m ETa product was the most versatile of the tested datasets, being able to differentiate between landuses during all seasons. Furthermore, the use of an averaging ensemble was able to improve overall ETa performance in the study area. This study showed that the remotely sensed ETa products are not similar throughout the year, but the appropriate application periods for different ETa products were identified. Finally, spatial variabilities of the ETa products are more in tune with landuse and climate characteristics.

中文翻译:

密歇根州一个流域的遥感和水文模型蒸散产品的变异性分析

本文的目的是在缺乏观测数据的区域中统计地探索遥感实际蒸散量(ETa)数据集和遥感集合的时空表现。进一步将遥感数据集与基于物理的水文模型(土壤和水评估工具)的ETa结果进行比较,以检查差异并确定ETa数据集与模型输出之间的一致性水平。在时间(即,月度和季节)和空间(即,土地利用)尺度上,在流域和子流域水平上对ETa数据集进行了比较。结果表明,在评估每月的ETa变化时,数据集之间缺乏一致的相似性和差异;然而,与秋季和冬季相比,春季和夏季的季节性汇总数据显示出更加一致的相似性和差异。同时,对数据集的空间分析表明,MOD16A2 500 m ETa产品是测试数据集中功能最丰富的,能够区分所有季节的土地利用。此外,平均合奏的使用能够改善研究区域的整体ETa性能。这项研究表明,遥感ETA产品全年都不相似,但是确定了不同ETA产品的适当应用期限。最后,ETa产品的空间变异性更符合土地利用和气候特征。数据集的空间分析表明,MOD16A2 500 m ETa产品是测试数据集中用途最广泛的,能够区分所有季节的土地利用。此外,平均合奏的使用能够改善研究区域的整体ETa性能。这项研究表明,遥感ETA产品全年都不相似,但是确定了不同ETA产品的适当应用期限。最后,ETa产品的空间变异性更符合土地利用和气候特征。数据集的空间分析表明,MOD16A2 500 m ETa产品是测试数据集中用途最广泛的,能够区分所有季节的土地利用。此外,平均合奏的使用能够改善研究区域的整体ETa性能。这项研究表明,遥感ETA产品全年都不相似,但是确定了不同ETA产品的适当应用期限。最后,ETa产品的空间变异性更符合土地利用和气候特征。这项研究表明,遥感ETA产品全年都不相似,但是确定了不同ETA产品的适当应用期限。最后,ETa产品的空间变异性更符合土地利用和气候特征。这项研究表明,遥感ETA产品全年都不相似,但是确定了不同ETA产品的适当应用期限。最后,ETa产品的空间变异性更符合土地利用和气候特征。
更新日期:2020-05-13
down
wechat
bug