ABSTRACT Large-scale bridge projects (LSBPs) have emerged due to the gradually increasing transportation needs of the connections between isolated regions. In planning, construction or completion of today’s LSBPs, responses are applied to risks arising in areas such as financial, design, environmental and managerial. The main objective of this study is to prioritise the risk responses from the contractors’ point of view used in LSBPs in Europe and the Middle East by using the analytical network process (ANP). The priorities obtained separately for Europe and the Middle East were compared between each other. The results display that Europe and the Middle East include both common and different risk responses. Two case studies, one in each region, have been conducted to further support the priority values acquired in this study. The priorities and responses obtained in this study can be used as standard risk response list for the prevention or elimination of risks during the planning, construction or completion phases of projects to be implemented in the field of LSBPs in various countries. Lastly, the priorities obtained in this study could be a mirror to detect or juxtapose changes in future studies in the same field.

中文翻译：

---

大型桥梁项目风险响应评估的ANP模型

摘要 由于孤立区域之间连接的运输需求逐渐增加，大型桥梁工程（LSBPs）应运而生。在当今 LSBP 的规划、建设或完成过程中，应对金融、设计、环境和管理等领域出现的风险进行应对。本研究的主要目的是通过使用分析网络过程 (ANP) 从承包商的角度对欧洲和中东 LSBP 中使用的风险响应进行优先排序。对欧洲和中东分别获得的优先事项进行了相互比较。结果显示，欧洲和中东包括共同的和不同的风险应对措施。已经进行了两个案例研究，每个区域一个，以进一步支持本研究中获得的优先价值。本研究中获得的优先级和响应可以作为标准的风险响应清单，用于各国LSBPs领域将要实施的项目在规划、建设或完成阶段预防或消除风险。最后，本研究中获得的优先事项可以成为检测或并列同一领域未来研究变化的一面镜子。