Large Interactive Displays (LIDs), such as tabletops or interactive walls, are promising innovations, which are increasingly used to support co-located collaboration. Yet the current evidence base on the impact of LID use on collaborative processes and outcomes, and associated influencing factors, is fragmented, particularly in comparison with other media. To address this gap, a systematic review was carried out in the databases Web of Science, Psych.Info, ACM, Elsevier, JSTOR and Springer and in the ACM CHI conference database. A corpus of 38 articles with experimental study designs met the eligibility criteria and was analyzed in-depth. With regard to collaboration processes, the findings suggest a relatively clear advantage of the use of LIDs over classic forms of collaboration, in particular over single-user environments (e.g. laptops). With attention to collaborative outcomes, positive effects of LIDs were identified for knowledge gains and social encounters, and mixed effects for task-related outcomes. The analysis further shows relevant influencing factors of LID, such as the separation of personal and joint work spaces and the deployment of horizontal instead of vertical displays. Conceptual and practice implications are discussed.

大型交互式显示器（LID），例如桌面或交互式墙，是很有前途的创新，越来越多地用于支持共地协作。但是，目前基于LID使用对协作过程和结果以及相关影响因素的影响的证据是零散的，特别是与其他媒体相比。为了解决这一差距，在Web of Science，Psych.Info，ACM，Elsevier，JSTOR和Springer等数据库以及ACM CHI会议数据库中进行了系统的审查。具有实验研究设计的38篇文章的语料库符合资格标准，并进行了深入分析。关于协作过程，研究结果表明使用LID相对于经典协作形式，尤其是相对于单用户环境（例如笔记本电脑）而言，具有相对明显的优势。通过关注协作成果，确定了LID对知识获取和社交接触的积极影响，以及对与任务相关的成果的混合影响。该分析还显示了LID的相关影响因素，例如个人和联合工作空间的分隔以及水平显示而不是垂直显示的部署。讨论了概念和实践的含义。