The original ideas on design abduction, inspired by treatments in philosophy of science, had a narrow conception on how novelty emerges in design, when looked at in terms of logic. The authors have previously presented a re-proposed notion of abduction in design, taking the differences between science and design into account. Now, in this article, the invention of the airplane by the Wright brothers is analyzed as a retrospective case study. Key parts of the re-proposed notion of design abduction are demonstrated, and two new types of design abduction are identified, namely strategic abduction and dynamic abduction. Perhaps even more importantly, a new hypothesis on the cognitive basis of design abduction is reached. While the importance of model-based abduction (and reasoning) is confirmed, the case also pinpoints the central role of verbalization and discussion in supporting design reasoning in general and especially abduction. All in all, it seems that an improved understanding of design abduction and its cognitive basis would be instrumental in promoting more effective and efficient designing.

中文翻译：

---

重新提出的设计绑架概念的演示、扩展和改进

受科学哲学治疗启发的关于设计溯因的最初想法，从逻辑的角度来看，对设计中的新颖性如何出现有一个狭隘的概念。考虑到科学与设计之间的差异，作者之前提出了重新提出的设计中的溯因概念。现在，在这篇文章中，莱特兄弟发明的飞机作为一个回顾性案例研究进行了分析。展示了重新提出的设计绑架概念的关键部分，并确定了两种新型设计绑架，即战略绑架和动态绑架。或许更重要的是，达成了关于设计溯因的认知基础的新假设。虽然确认了基于模型的溯因（和推理）的重要性，该案例还指出了语言表达和讨论在支持一般设计推理，尤其是溯因推理方面的核心作用。总而言之，对设计溯因及其认知基础的更好理解似乎将有助于促进更有效和高效的设计。