Axillary vein access (AVA) using fluoroscopic landmarks is an effective and safe approach for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) implantation. However, it may result in a higher radiation exposure. Ultrasound‐guided axillary access (USAA) is an effective alternative technique to conventional subclavian access for CIEDs implantation. Studies comparing USAA and AVA using fluoroscopic landmarks are lacking. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety, efficacy, and radiation exposure data of the USAA approach with the AVA using fluoroscopic landmarks.

中文翻译：

---

用于永久起搏器和植入式心律转复除颤器植入的腋静脉通路：透视与超声的比较。

使用透视标记的腋静脉通路 (AVA) 是一种有效且安全的心脏植入式电子设备 (CIED) 植入方法。但是，它可能会导致更高的辐射暴露。超声引导腋窝通路（USAA）是传统锁骨下通路 CIED 植入的有效替代技术。缺乏使用透视标志比较 USAA 和 AVA 的研究。本研究的目的是比较 USAA 方法与 AVA 使用透视标志物的安全性、有效性和辐射暴露数据。