How can command-and-control instruments (CACs) influence consumers’ adoption of energy consumption monitoring technology (ECMT) in public buildings? We attempt to answer this question in an extended theory of planned behaviour in which CACs and energy-saving awareness (ESA) are introduced. Empirical data are collected by a questionnaire survey with 298 respondents, and structural equation modelling (SEM) is used to analyse the research model. The results indicate that ESA has a direct impact on consumers’ adoption of ECMT. The CACs have no direct effect on consumers’ adoption of ECMT but can indirectly affect consumers’ adoption of ECMT through three paths: CAC → ATT (attitudes) → BI (behavioural intention), CAC → ESA → BI and CAC → SN (subjective norm) → BI. Finally, suggestions are proposed, such as optimising the selection and combination of policy instruments, promoting the operation manager’s attitude towards ECMT to a more positive orientation, improving the ESA of the operation manager and providing more support for and pressure on the operation manager who has not adopted ECMT.

中文翻译：

---

指挥控制手段对公共建筑能耗监测技术的影响机理分析

指挥控制工具（CAC）如何影响消费者在公共建筑中采用能耗监测技术（ECMT）？我们试图在计划行为的扩展理论中回答这个问题，在该理论中引入了CAC和节能意识（ESA）。通过对298位受访者的问卷调查收集经验数据，并使用结构方程模型（SEM）来分析研究模型。结果表明，ESA对消费者采用ECMT有直接影响。CAC对消费者采用ECMT没有直接影响，但可以通过以下三种途径间接影响消费者对ECMT的采用：CAC→ATT（态度）→BI（行为意图），CAC→ESA→BI和CAC→SN（主观规范） ）→BI。最后，提出了建议，