当前位置: X-MOL 学术Int. J. Prod. Econ. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Who should lead carbon emissions reductions? Upstream vs. downstream firms
International Journal of Production Economics ( IF 12.0 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107790
Seungrae Lee , Seung Jae Park

Abstract In this study, we consider two firms in a supply chain, namely an upstream firm and a downstream firm. The downstream firm sources products from the upstream firm for the further production and makes sales to the final consumers, and each firm strives to reduce carbon emissions. We find that one firm’s support on another firm to reduce carbon emissions always benefits all players in the supply chain in terms of firm profit, consumer utility, and carbon emissions reduction, compared with the no supporting case. In addition, we show that the upstream firm’s support on the downstream firm creates more benefit than the downstream firm’s support on the upstream firm. While higher carbon emissions reduction effort is not a panacea for the environment, the support from the upstream firm tends to be more effective in reducing total carbon emissions

中文翻译:

谁应该领导碳减排?上游与下游公司

摘要 在本研究中,我们考虑供应链中的两个企业,即上游企业和下游企业。下游企业从上游企业采购产品用于进一步生产并销售给最终消费者,每个企业都努力减少碳排放。我们发现,与没有支持的情况相比,一家公司对另一家公司减少碳排放的支持在公司利润、消费者效用和碳排放减少方面总是有益于供应链中的所有参与者。此外,我们表明上游企业对下游企业的支持比下游企业对上游企业的支持创造了更多的收益。虽然更高的碳减排努力并不是解决环境问题的灵丹妙药,
更新日期:2020-12-01
down
wechat
bug