Both “interdisciplinarity” and “synergy” are desirable features from a policy perspective: can surplus be found in the interactions among (disciplinary) bodies of knowledge? We have recently developed measures for “interdisciplinarity” and distinguished these measurements from those of “synergy.” In this study, we analyze three review papers by Judit Bar-Ilan (Scientometrics 50(1):7–32, 2001, Ann Rev Inf Sci Technol (ARIST) 38:231–288, 2004, J Informetr 2(1):1–52, 2008a) in terms of whether they rank high on interdisciplinarity and synergy values among the 130 papers of her œuvre. Review papers can be expected to fulfill a synergetic and perhaps also interdisciplinary function in scientific literature more than research articles, since the literature is considered from a broader perspective. Both the interdisciplinarity and synergy indicators point to Bar-Ilan (2004). The three reviews have high synergy scores. Whereas Bar-Ilan (2008a) contributed to the redefinition and shaping of the discipline of “information science,” Bar-Ilan (2004) added the broader perspective of the theoretical and practical relevance of the discipline. Bar-Ilan (2001) reviews various methods for data collection at the Internet. An article of Bar-Ilan and Peritz (2002) in Library Trends scores also high on synergy.

中文翻译：

---

Judit Bar-Ilan 的 Œuvre 中的“跨学科”和“协同作用”

从政策的角度来看，“跨学科性”和“协同性”都是可取的特征：在（学科）知识体系之间的相互作用中能否找到盈余？我们最近开发了“跨学科”的衡量标准，并将这些衡量标准与“协同效应”的衡量标准区分开来。在这项研究中，我们分析了 Judit Bar-Ilan 的三篇评论论文（Scientometrics 50(1):7–32, 2001, Ann Rev Inf Sci Technol (AIST) 38:231–288, 2004, J Informetr 2(1)）： 1–52, 2008a) 在她的 œuvre 的 130 篇论文中，它们在跨学科和协同价值方面是否排名靠前。与研究论文相比，评论论文有望在科学文献中发挥协同作用，甚至跨学科功能，因为文献是从更广泛的角度考虑的。跨学科性和协同性指标都指向 Bar-Ilan (2004)。三篇评论的协同评分都很高。Bar-Ilan (2008a) 对“信息科学”学科的重新定义和塑造做出了贡献，而 Bar-Ilan (2004) 则增加了该学科理论和实践相关性的更广泛视角。Bar-Ilan (2001) 回顾了在互联网上收集数据的各种方法。Bar-Ilan 和 Peritz (2002) 在 Library Trends 中的一篇文章在协同作用方面得分也很高。Bar-Ilan (2001) 回顾了在互联网上收集数据的各种方法。Bar-Ilan 和 Peritz (2002) 在 Library Trends 中的一篇文章在协同作用方面得分也很高。Bar-Ilan (2001) 回顾了在互联网上收集数据的各种方法。Bar-Ilan 和 Peritz (2002) 在 Library Trends 中的一篇文章在协同作用方面得分也很高。