当前位置: X-MOL 学术Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparative cost-effectiveness of amisulpride and olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia in China.
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research ( IF 2.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-04-26 , DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1752670
Zhan-Miao Yi 1, 2, 3 , Peng Men 1, 3 , Shuli Qu 4 , Chaoyun Li 5 , Xin Yu 6 , Suodi Zhai 1, 3
Affiliation  

Background: Both amisulpride and olanzapine are leading treatments for schizophrenia in China. This study aimed to investigate the long-term cost-effectiveness of amisulpride and olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia in China.Methods: A decision-analytic Markov model was developed to simulate the lifetime clinical and economic outcomes of schizophrenia treatment from the healthcare payer perspective. The long-term costs and QALYs were estimated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the impact of variance of parameters on the results.Results: Treatment with amisulpride provided an effectiveness gain of 16.59 QALYs at an average cost of USD 25,884 whereas olanzapine resulted in 16.38 QALYs at a cost of USD 34,839 over a lifetime horizon. One-way sensitivity analysis suggested that the most sensitive variable was the unit cost of olanzapine. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis based on a Monte Carlo simulation with a lifetime horizon, the probability of amisulpride being cost-effective was 99.8% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of USD 9,322, the GDP per capita in China 2018. A scenario analysis with updated olanzapine unit cost suggested an ICER of 7,857 USD/QALY.Conclusions: Amisulpride is likely to be a cost-effective option with increased effectiveness compared with olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia patients in China.
更新日期:2020-04-26
down
wechat
bug