Kant (1724–1804) is rarely mentioned in modern neuroscience publications, and equally rarely are insights from the neurosciences discussed in works on Kantian philosophy. In this essay I present a correlation, not a confrontation, between Kant in the ‘Critique of Pure Reason’ and the neurosciences on space, time, categories, mechanics, and consciousness in order to highlight their mutual importance. My conclusion will be that Kant is still important for modern neuroscience, although historically he lacked all relevant data and concepts about the brain, and that the insights from neuroscience are equally important for philosophy.

中文翻译：

---

空间、时间、范畴、力学和意识：论康德和神经科学

康德（1724-1804）在现代神经科学出版物中很少被提及，在康德哲学著作中也很少提到来自神经科学的见解。在这篇文章中，我提出了康德在《纯粹理性批判》中与关于空间、时间、范畴、力学和意识的神经科学之间的关联，而不是对抗，以突出它们的相互重要性。我的结论是，康德对现代神经科学仍然很重要，尽管从历史上看，他缺乏关于大脑的所有相关数据和概念，而且来自神经科学的见解对哲学同样重要。