In Singapore, owners of private housing estates reaping windfalls through collective sales have been subject to the news media's sensational coverage of the topic. While collective sales will give rise to new developments that regenerate the country's landscape to reflect the image and identity of an entrepreneurial city, efforts to resist this wealth generating urbanism are subject to erasure. Instances of minority owners disinterested in profit‐making using the courts to save their homes from the collective sale juggernaut are certainly emblematic of the inherent tension between one's home as housing and home as investment repository. Drawing upon ethnographical experiences from a housing estate built for public officials in Singapore, this article's use of the Lefebvrian theory of spatial production sheds light on how minority owners unmotivated by monetary windfalls (re)produce spaces of their homes that are overtly inimical to the impulses of majority owners to monetize their homes at high premiums.

中文翻译：

---

超越新加坡房地产意外之财的景象：勒费布里亚式的家庭空间反对获利

在新加坡，私人住宅的所有者通过集体销售获得了丰厚的回报，这要受到新闻媒体对这一话题的轰动报道。集体销售将带来新的发展，使国家的面貌焕然一新，以反映出一个企业家城市的形象和特征，而抵制这种产生财富的城市主义的努力则有待消除。少数族裔业主对利用法院将其房屋从集体买卖的巨额财产中解救出来的利润不感兴趣的例子无疑象征着一个人的房屋（作为住房）与房屋（作为投资储存库）之间的内在张力。借鉴在新加坡为公职人员建造的住宅中的人种学经验，本文'