当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Rat. Emo. Cognitive Behav. Ther. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A Turkish Translation of a Measure of Irrational and Rational Beliefs: Reliability, Validity Studies and Confirmation of the Four Cognitive Processes Model
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy ( IF 1.952 ) Pub Date : 2020-02-08 , DOI: 10.1007/s10942-020-00340-9
Murat Artiran , Raymond DiGiuseppe

This study adapted the Attitudes and Belief Scale-2 (ABS-2) into Turkish and investigated its factor structure, criterion-related validity, and psychometric properties. The ABS-2 assesses REBT’s irrational and rational beliefs. Each item reflects one of the four cognitive processes thought identified the theory to reflect irrationality or rationality. These include demandingness versus preferences, awfulizing versus realistic negative evaluations, frustration intolerance versus tolerance, and self-condemnation versus self-acceptance. Each item reflects one of three content areas of achievement, affiliation, or comfort. Despite the ABS-2’s good validity, researchers have criticized its factor structure. This weak support questions REBT’s theoretical assumptions. This article includes four studies that describe the translation into Turkish and comparability of the two versions, the test–retest reliability, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and criterion-related validity. The four samples consisted of 811 participants. A two-factor structure (one representing rational items and another consists irrational beliefs items) was supported by confirmatory factor analysis. Criterion-related validity analysis was supported as the ABS-2 correlated positively with the Jones’ Irrational Beliefs Test, anxiety and depression dimensions of brief symptom inventory, and the need for absolute truth. The research supported the four cognitive process model.

中文翻译:

非理性和理性信念测量的土耳其语翻译:四种认知过程模型的可靠性、有效性研究和确认

本研究将态度和信念量表-2 (ABS-2) 改编成土耳其语,并调查了其因素结构、与标准相关的有效性和心理测量特性。ABS-2 评估 REBT 的非理性和理性信念。每个项目反映了四个认知过程中的一个,认为该理论反映了非理性或理性。这些包括要求与偏好,可怕与现实的负面评价,挫折不容忍与容忍,以及自我谴责与自我接受。每个项目都反映了成就、隶属关系或舒适度三个内容领域之一。尽管 ABS-2 的有效性良好,但研究人员对其因子结构提出了批评。这种弱支持质疑 REBT 的理论假设。本文包括四项研究,这些研究描述了两个版本的土耳其语翻译和可比性、重测信度、探索性和验证性因素分析以及与标准相关的效度。这四个样本由 811 名参与者组成。验证性因素分析支持双因素结构(一个代表理性项目,另一个包含非理性信念项目)。支持与标准相关的有效性分析,因为 ABS-2 与琼斯的非理性信念测试、简短症状清单的焦虑和抑郁维度以及对绝对真理的需求呈正相关。该研究支持四种认知过程模型。这四个样本由 811 名参与者组成。验证性因素分析支持双因素结构(一个代表理性项目,另一个包含非理性信念项目)。支持与标准相关的有效性分析,因为 ABS-2 与琼斯的非理性信念测试、简短症状清单的焦虑和抑郁维度以及对绝对真理的需求呈正相关。该研究支持四种认知过程模型。这四个样本由 811 名参与者组成。验证性因素分析支持双因素结构(一个代表理性项目,另一个包含非理性信念项目)。支持与标准相关的有效性分析,因为 ABS-2 与琼斯的非理性信念测试、简短症状清单的焦虑和抑郁维度以及对绝对真理的需求呈正相关。该研究支持四种认知过程模型。以及对绝对真理的需要。该研究支持四种认知过程模型。以及对绝对真理的需要。该研究支持四种认知过程模型。
更新日期:2020-02-08
down
wechat
bug