当前位置: X-MOL 学术Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Efficiency of fall versus spring applied urea‐based fertilizers treated with urease and nitrification inhibitors I. Ammonia volatilization and mitigation by NBPT
Soil Science Society of America Journal ( IF 2.9 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-07 , DOI: 10.1002/saj2.20062
Ahmed A. Lasisi 1 , Olalekan O. Akinremi 1 , Qiang Zhang 2 , Darshani Kumaragamage 3
Affiliation  

Mid‐ or late‐fall N fertilization is usually recommended on the Canadian prairies to reduce N losses from fall‐applied N. Yet, N fertilizers are less efficient when applied in mid‐ or late fall than in spring on crop yield. Ammonia volatilization from N fertilizers is one of the reasons for the low N use efficiency. We conducted a 2‐yr study to quantify and contrast the efficacy of a urease inhibitor, N‐(n‐butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT), with and without a nitrification inhibitor, 3,4‐ dimethylpyrazole phosphate (NI), in reducing NH3 volatilization from fall‐ and spring‐applied urea‐based fertilizers in two contrasting soils. Treatments consisted of surface‐applied urea and urea–NH4NO3 (UAN) with and without NBPT or NBPT + NI (double inhibitor, DI). We measured NH3 volatilization with acid‐charged disks during 21 (fall) or 28 (spring) d. Total NH3 volatilization (percentage of applied N) from untreated urea and UAN across sites ranged from 7 to 22% with fall application and from 3 to 29% with spring application. Addition of NBPT only or DI to urea or UAN reduced NH3 volatilization by 61 to 74% in the fall and 4 to 69% in the spring across site‐years. We found that the reduction of NH3 volatilization by NBPT was significantly greater in the fall (65%) than in the spring (40%) and with urea (61%) than with UAN (43%). Our study showed that (a) significant NH3 volatilization could occur from surface‐applied urea‐based fertilizers even under late‐fall temperatures and (b) NBPT reduced NH3 volatilization from fall‐ as well as spring‐applied urea‐based fertilizers. Therefore, farmers are encouraged to treat their urea‐based fertilizers with NBPT when considering surface application.

中文翻译:

尿素酶和硝化抑制剂处理的秋季尿素与春季尿素基肥料的效率I. NBPT的氨挥发和缓解

通常建议在加拿大大草原上施用中后期或后期氮肥,以减少秋季施用的氮素造成的氮素损失。然而,秋季中后期或秋季施用氮肥的效率低于春季。氮肥中的氨挥发是氮利用效率低的原因之一。我们进行了为期2年的研究,以量化和对比尿素酶抑制剂N-(正丁基)硫代磷酸三酰胺(NBPT),有和没有硝化抑制剂3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸酯(NI)在还原中的功效在两种相反的土壤中,秋季和春季施用的尿素基肥料中的NH 3挥发。处理包括表面施用的尿素和尿素-NH 4 NO 3(UAN)有和没有NBPT或NBPT + NI(双重抑制剂,DI)。我们在第21天(秋季)或第28天(春季)用带电荷的圆盘测量了NH 3挥发。秋季施用时,未处理尿素和UAN的总NH 3挥发量(施用的N百分比)在秋季施用时为7%至22%,在春季施用时为3%至29%。在整个站点年间,仅在尿素或UAN中添加NBPT或DI即可减少NH 3挥发量,秋季减少61%至74%,春季减少4%至69%。我们发现,秋季(65%)比春季(40%)和尿素(61%)比UAN(43%)明显减少,NBPT减少的NH 3挥发量更大。我们的研究表明(a)大量的NH 3即使在晚秋温度下,表面施用的基于尿素的肥料也可能发生挥发,并且(b)NBPT减少了秋季施用的NH 3和春季施用的尿素的肥料的挥发。因此,鼓励农民在考虑表面施肥时用NBPT处理其尿素基肥料。
更新日期:2020-05-07
down
wechat
bug