Abstract The research examined with in depth clinical interviews (N = 48), how adolescents aged 13–17, and young adults aged 18–25 reasoned about human rights. Participants were presented with general questions about human rights and four contextualized situations in which violations of human rights occur. Results showed that adolescents and young adults judged and reasoned similarly about human rights in response to general questions, but there was more variation in judgments and justifications about specific situations involving violations of human rights. Within specific contexts individuals consider different aspects of situations and balance or coordinate them in coming to decisions. However, all ages approached the general issue of human rights, and their violations, primarily from a moral perspective and to a lesser extent from the perspectives of societal organization and cultural practices. Less agreement, and less moral reasoning, was found in reference to punishment of human rights violations.

中文翻译：

---

青少年对尊重和侵犯人权的判断

摘要 该研究通过深入的临床访谈（N = 48）检验了 13-17 岁的青少年和 18-25 岁的年轻人如何对人权进行推理。向参与者提出了关于人权的一般性问题以及发生侵犯人权行为的四种情境。结果表明，青少年和年轻人在回答一般问题时对人权的判断和推理相似，但对涉及侵犯人权的具体情况的判断和理由差异更大。在特定情况下，个人会考虑情况的不同方面，并在做出决定时平衡或协调它们。然而，所有年龄段的人都谈到了人权的普遍问题及其侵犯行为，主要是从道德的角度来看，在较小程度上从社会组织和文化实践的角度来看。在惩罚侵犯人权行为方面，人们发现较少的共识和较少的道德推理。