当前位置: X-MOL 学术Surf. Topogr.: Metrol. Prop. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparison of three multiscale methods for topographic analyses
Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties ( IF 2.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-04-05 , DOI: 10.1088/2051-672x/ab8348
Robin Guibert 1 , Sad Hanafi 1 , Raphal Deltombe 1 , Maxence Bigerelle 1 , Christopher A Brown 2
Affiliation  

There is a growing demand for high level surface characterization. The functionality of machine parts, such as tribological behavior, depends on the texture of contacting surfaces. The relation between texture parameters depending on the scaling of texture features, finishing process parameters, such as grain sizes for grinding, and functionality of a surface is investigated. Due to the fractal aspect of the studied surfaces, more advanced tools are used for characterization. This article presents a comparison of three different segmentation methods (patchwork, box, and motif) for multiscale decomposition, using different roughness parameters to analyse the texture of polymer samples finished with various abrasive papers from FEPA grade 80 to 4000 to represent varying abrasion on the different scales. The consistencies and discrepancies of the different procedures of multiscale decomposition in the relation between separability of macro and micro abrasions, identification of sel...

中文翻译:

三种多尺度地形学分析方法的比较

对高级表面表征的需求不断增长。机器零件的功能(例如摩擦行为)取决于接触表面的纹理。研究了纹理参数之间的关系,该纹理参数取决于纹理特征的缩放比例,精加工过程参数(例如用于研磨的晶粒大小)和表面的功能。由于所研究表面的分形方面,因此使用了更高级的工具进行表征。本文比较了三种用于多尺度分解的不同分割方法(拼布法,方盒和母题),使用不同的粗糙度参数来分析用FEPA 80至4000级各种砂纸完成的聚合物样品的织构,以表现出不同的磨损。不同的规模。
更新日期:2020-04-13
down
wechat
bug