当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Environ. Law › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Equity and the Paris Agreement: Legal and Philosophical Perspectives
Journal of Environmental Law ( IF 1.750 ) Pub Date : 2019-06-30 , DOI: 10.1093/jel/eqz017
Peter Lawrence 1 , Michael Reder 2
Affiliation  

Equity has both legal and philosophical meanings. The Paris Agreement includes important references to equity, including in relation to the global stocktake. Elaborating equity in relation to the Paris Agreement regime can be done as part of the Paris Agreement; outside the Agreement eg through climate think tanks; or not at all—viz implicitly. These options are assessed in terms of their effectiveness, legitimacy and political feasibility drawing on philosophical concepts of equity. The latter—particularly Aristotle—provides a fresh lens for interpreting understandings of equity that have developed within the Paris regime. Elaborating equity outside the Paris Agreement is the most politically feasible option, while weaker in terms of likely effectiveness. Ultimately, the Paris Agreement regime will only succeed if parties are willing to embrace Aristotle’s concept of equity in the sense of acting morally with a willingness to compromise for the greater good

中文翻译:

公平与巴黎协定:法律和哲学视角

公平具有法律意义和哲学意义。《巴黎协定》包括对公平的重要参考,包括与全球盘点有关的参考。详细阐述与《巴黎协定》制度有关的公平可作为《巴黎协定》的一部分进行;在协议之外,例如通过气候智囊团;或者根本不——即隐含地。根据公平的哲学概念,根据有效性、合法性和政治可行性对这些选项进行评估。后者——尤其是亚里士多德——为解释在巴黎政权内发展起来的公平理解提供了新的视角。在巴黎协定之外制定公平是政治上最可行的选择,但在可能的有效性方面较弱。最终,
更新日期:2019-06-30
down
wechat
bug