Cultural ecosystem services are the benefits experienced by people visiting ecological resources. These services are assessed based on visitors’ behaviors and perception. Existing quantitative methods based on questionnaire surveys and geotagged photographs are useful in comparative analysis; however, they only address the items presented by researchers. This makes it difficult to explain unique user activities related to cultural ecosystem services in a specific area and the reasons behind their use. Qualitative analytics, which has been identified as an alternative, is ideal for confirming the features of local cultural ecosystem services but is limited in terms of quantification. In light of such limitations, this study opted for text mining as a tool for quantifying the opinions of local residents and the features of local cultural ecosystem services that were expressed during workshops. Specifically, the most frequently used keywords were selected from local residents’ texts concerning ecological knowledge and their opinions of cultural ecosystem services, and factor analysis was conducted for each ecological resource to shed light on the features of the cultural ecosystem services provided by each ecological resource. The analysis of Gwangju (Gyeonggi-do) Province, South Korea, showed that the main user activities related to cultural ecosystem services included mountain climbing, farm programs, and history and culture programs, among others. It also revealed local user activities in cultural ecosystem services in each ecological resource—ecosystem services provided by a public stadium in association with adjacent wetlands. It was observed that the indicator “recreation” was subdivided into “mountain climbing,” “exercise,” “strolling,” etc., in relation to “health value.” Meanwhile, the indicator “cultural heritage” was distinguished by the special user activity “ceramics” and was associated with “educational value.” It could also be qualitatively seen that “aesthetic value” was regarded as a benefit that accompanied the experience of “mountain climbing” and “exercise,” which may be enjoyed when visiting places of “nature,” “ecosystems,” or “plants” with “family,” in relation to “social relations value.” “Spiritual/religious value” was related to “cultural heritage” in Catholic sacred sites. However, limitations were found in the analysis of cultural ecosystem services based on the opinions of local residents, as it is difficult to compare them with the services of other regions. Thus, further advanced research on cultural ecosystem services is required to uncover regional user activities and allow for a comparative analysis between regions.

文化生态系统服务是人们访问生态资源所获得的利益。这些服务是根据访问者的行为和感知进行评估的。基于问卷调查和带有地理标签的照片的现有定量方法可用于比较分析。但是，它们仅解决研究人员提出的问题。这使得很难解释与特定地区文化生态系统服务有关的独特用户活动及其使用背后的原因。定性分析已被确认为一种替代方法，是确认当地文化生态系统服务功能的理想选择，但在量化方面受到限制。鉴于这些限制，这项研究选择文本挖掘作为量化研讨会期间表达的当地居民意见和当地文化生态系统服务功能的工具。具体而言，从当地居民关于生态知识及其对文化生态系统服务的看法的文本中选择最常用的关键字，并对每种生态资源进行因子分析，以阐明每种生态资源提供的文化生态系统服务的特征。 。对韩国光州（Gyeonggi-do）的分析表明，与文化生态系统服务相关的主要用户活动包括登山，农场计划以及历史和文化计划等。它还揭示了每种生态资源中文化生态系统服务中的本地用户活动，即由公共体育场与邻近湿地相关联提供的生态系统服务。据观察，与“健康价值”相关的指标“娱乐”被细分为“登山”，“锻炼”，“漫步”等。同时，“文化遗产”指标以特殊用户活动“陶瓷”为特征，并与“教育价值”相关联。从质上也可以看出，“审美价值”被认为是伴随着“登山”和“运动”经历的一种好处，当您参观“自然”，“生态系统”或“植物”的地方时可能会享受到与“家庭”有关，与“社会关系价值”有关。”“精神/宗教价值”与天主教圣地中的“文化遗产”有关。但是，根据当地居民的意见对文化生态系统服务进行分析时存在局限性，因为很难将其与其他地区的服务进行比较。因此，需要对文化生态系统服务进行进一步的高级研究，以发现区域用户活动并进行区域之间的比较分析。