Valuation can be used for a wide range of purposes, including informing environmental decision-making, designing and evaluating policies, and acknowledging and raising awareness of the importance of the environment. A promising development in the field of environmental valuation that is receiving increasing attention is the hybridization of stated preference methods and deliberative approaches. Proponents claim that deliberative monetary valuation (DMV) can successfully address many of the limitations ascribed to more conventional monetary valuation approaches. However, DMV has scarcely been tested in contexts of the Global South thus far, where arguably, the benefits it offers may be most relevant. In this paper we study the applicability DMV on preference elicitation in a rural Indigenous community in Colombia. We find that DMV is superior to conventional stated preference approaches in terms of its capacity to elicit more considered, informed, and diverse values. Our results suggest that DMV offers learning opportunities for participants, the benefits of which are greater for those for whom conventional valuation exercises may seem too cognitively complex. We find that by the end of the deliberative workshop, participants were considering a wider range of preferences. We control for one of the main risks of DMV, which is the possibility of participants with a higher social status exercising a dominant role during the deliberative process, and do not find evidence of this being the case. Our results suggest that one of the main advantages of DMV is its capacity to capture a much broader set of values than conventional valuation approaches, including instrumental, relational and intrinsic values.

评估可用于多种目的，包括告知环境决策，设计和评估政策，以及确认和提高对环境重要性的认识。在环境评估领域中，一个有希望的发展正在受到越来越多的关注，那就是既定的偏好方法和审议方法的混合。支持者声称，审议性货币估值（DMV）可以成功解决许多归因于传统货币估值方法的局限性。但是，到目前为止，DMV几乎没有在南方南方进行过测试，可以说，它提供的好处可能是最相关的。在本文中，我们研究了DMV在哥伦比亚农村土著社区偏好激发中的适用性。我们发现DMV在引发更多考虑，知情和多样化价值的能力方面优于常规陈述的偏好方法。我们的结果表明，DMV为参与者提供了学习机会，对于那些传统的估值练习在认知上似乎过于复杂的人们而言，DMV的好处更大。我们发现，在讨论会结束时，参与者正在考虑更广泛的偏好。我们控制着DMV的主要风险之一，这是较高的社会地位的参与者在审议过程中扮演主导角色的可能性，而没有找到这种情况的证据。我们的结果表明，DMV的主要优势之一是与传统的估值方法相比，它能够捕获更广泛的价值，