This paper was published with an error in the figures. Figure 4, which should have been the SEM images and roughness measurements of the silk paper samples, was not in the final paper. Instead, Figure 5 (the stability of the nanofiber suspensions and zeta potential) was printed twice as Figures 4 and 5. The corrected version of Figure 4, along with the figure legend, is provided here. Figure 4. SEM images of the SNF paper on both sides. (a,b) 1M+H top and bottom; (c) 1M+H roughness; (d,e) 2M top and bottom; (f) 2 M roughness; (g,h) 2M+H top and bottom; (i) 2M+H roughness; (j,k) 3M top and bottom; (l) 3 M roughness; (m,n) 3M+H top and bottom; (o) 3M+H roughness (scale bars: main images = 10 μm, inset images = 2 μm). Double headed white arrow in (g) indicates an example of a poorly fibrillated fiber bundle, width = 8.17 μm. Inset images show a higher magnification view of the larger image. Roughness graphs show mean ± standard deviation, star symbols on graphs (*) indicate statistically significant difference between the roughness of the top and bottom surface (t test statistic: P < 0.05). This article has not yet been cited by other publications. Figure 4. SEM images of the SNF paper on both sides. (a,b) 1M+H top and bottom; (c) 1M+H roughness; (d,e) 2M top and bottom; (f) 2 M roughness; (g,h) 2M+H top and bottom; (i) 2M+H roughness; (j,k) 3M top and bottom; (l) 3 M roughness; (m,n) 3M+H top and bottom; (o) 3M+H roughness (scale bars: main images = 10 μm, inset images = 2 μm). Double headed white arrow in (g) indicates an example of a poorly fibrillated fiber bundle, width = 8.17 μm. Inset images show a higher magnification view of the larger image. Roughness graphs show mean ± standard deviation, star symbols on graphs (*) indicate statistically significant difference between the roughness of the top and bottom surface (t test statistic: P < 0.05).

中文翻译：

---

对“剥落的Eri丝绸纳米纤维的蛋白质纸”的更正。

该论文发表时附图有误。图4应该是丝纸样品的SEM图像和粗糙度测量值，但不在最终纸中。取而代之的是，图5（纳米纤维悬浮液的稳定性和zeta电位）被印刷两次，如图4和5所示。此处提供了图4的修正版本以及图例。图4.双面SNF纸的SEM图像。（a，b）1M + H顶部和底部；（c）1M + H粗糙度；（d，e）顶部和底部2M；（f）2 M粗糙度；（g，h）顶部和底部2M + H；（i）2M + H粗糙度；（j，k）3M顶部和底部；（l）3 M粗糙度；（m，n）顶部和底部3M + H；（o）3M + H粗糙度（比例尺：主图像= 10μm，插图= 2μm）。（g）中的双头白色箭头表示原纤化纤维束不良的示例，宽度= 8.17μm。插图图像显示较大图像的较高放大倍率视图。粗糙度图显示平均值±标准偏差，图上的星号（*）表示顶部和底部表面的粗糙度之间具有统计显着性差异（t检验统计量：P <0.05）。本文尚未被其他出版物引用。图4.双面SNF纸的SEM图像。（a，b）1M + H顶部和底部；（c）1M + H粗糙度；（d，e）顶部和底部2M；（f）2 M粗糙度；（g，h）顶部和底部2M + H；（i）2M + H粗糙度；（j，k）3M顶部和底部；（l）3 M粗糙度；（m，n）顶部和底部3M + H；（o）3M + H粗糙度（比例尺：主图像= 10μm，插图= 2μm）。（g）中的双头白色箭头表示原纤化纤维束不良的示例，宽度= 8.17μm。插图图像显示较大图像的较高放大倍率视图。粗糙度图显示平均值±标准偏差，图上的星号（*）表示顶部和底部表面的粗糙度（t检验统计量：P <0.05）。