当前位置: X-MOL 学术JAMA Pediatr. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Inaccuracies Regarding the Joint Commission Newborn Identification Standard-Reply.
JAMA Pediatrics ( IF 26.1 ) Pub Date : 2020-06-01 , DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0068
Gary L Freed 1, 2
Affiliation  

In Reply In my Editorial1 of the article by Adelman et al,2 there is no statement that the distinct naming convention failed to reduce wrong patient error rates in multiple-birth newborns. There are statements in the Editorial1 that report the findings of the study support the authors’ hypothesis2 that following the adoption of the Joint Commission standard, wrong patient errors among children of multiple births were approximately twice that of singleton errors, and the excess risk increased with the number of siblings in the neonatal intensive care unit.



中文翻译:

关于联合委员会新生儿识别标准答复的错误。

在回复在我的编辑1文章被阿德尔曼等人,2没有声明中表示,不同的命名约定,不能降低多新生儿出生错误的病人的错误率。社论1中有陈述陈述了研究结果,这支持了作者的假设2。在采用联合委员会标准之后,多胎子女的错误患者错误约为单身错误的两倍,而且存在过多风险随着新生儿重症监护室中兄弟姐妹数量的增加而增加。

更新日期:2020-06-01
down
wechat
bug