Traditionally, the preferred means of documentation used by safety engineers have been sheets- and text-based solutions. However, in the last decades, the introduction of model-driven engineering in conjunction with Component-Based Design has been influencing the way safety engineers perform their tasks; especially in the area of fault analysis, model-driven approaches have been developed aimed at coupling fault trees with architecture models. Doing this fosters communication between engineers, may reduce design effort, and makes artifacts easier to maintain and reuse. In this paper, we want to move forward in this direction and take another step in the modeling of Component Fault Trees in combination with the modeling of the architecture design. We propose a hazard-centric approach for the definition of multiple realization views for fault analysis using Component Fault Trees. The approach is composed of a modeling method and a tool solution. We illustrate our approach with a real-life example from the automotive industry.

传统上，安全工程师首选的文档编制方法是基于工作表和文本的解决方案。然而，在过去的几十年中，模型驱动工程与基于组件的设计相结合的引入一直影响着安全工程师执行任务的方式。特别是在故障分析领域，已经开发了模型驱动的方法，旨在将故障树与体系结构模型耦合。这样做可以促进工程师之间的交流，可以减少设计工作，并使工件更易于维护和重用。在本文中，我们希望朝这个方向前进，并在与结构设计的建模相结合的组件故障树建模中迈出新的一步。我们提出了一种以风险为中心的方法，用于定义多个实现视图，以使用组件故障树进行故障分析。该方法由建模方法和工具解决方案组成。我们以汽车行业的实际案例来说明我们的方法。