Information that is generated through the inclusion of different knowledge sources as a process of intensive negotiation, and mutual learning, is essential for adaptive co-management. To determine if participatory monitoring is fostering social learning and contributing to adaptive co-management, we propose a process of selection and assessment of environmental learning objectives and indicators. We draw from a case study regarding natural resources participatory monitoring in Calakmul, Campeche, Mexico. To guide the selection of indicators of advances in learning, we used the environmental citizenship framework. This framework considers the ecological knowledge and scientific tools acquired through the process, as well as the social, cultural and ethical capacities achieved that are useful for environmental management. The use of this framework helped orient the process towards attributes sought as important for community researchers, as well as to pay attention to the interactions between external actors and community researchers within the collaborative research effort. Most indicators selected corresponded to those related to natural resources management, yet indicators were also selected to measure progress regarding communication abilities among community members, their organization and critical attitudes. Differences in expectations between external actors and community researchers, have to do with distinct needs and realities, as well as with the recent history of the community. The adaptive process resulted in an important tool for helping all participants, manage different visions during the process, as well as obtain consensus on concepts and constantly redefining activities as need in the process.

中文翻译：

---

选择指标作为参与性监测中谈判目标和评估目标的工具

通过广泛的协商和相互学习的过程，通过包含不同的知识源而生成的信息对于自适应协同管理至关重要。为了确定参与式监测是否正在促进社会学习并促进适应性共同管理，我们提出了选择和评估环境学习目标和指标的过程。我们从有关墨西哥坎佩切州卡拉克穆尔的自然资源参与性监测的案例研究中得出结论。为了指导学习进展指标的选择，我们使用了环境公民框架。该框架考虑了在此过程中获得的生态知识和科学工具，以及所获得的对环境管理有用的社会，文化和道德能力。该框架的使用有助于使流程指向对社区研究者重要的属性，并注意协作研究工作中外部参与者与社区研究者之间的相互作用。所选的大多数指标与自然资源管理相关，但也选择了指标来衡量社区成员之间的沟通能力，他们的组织和批判态度方面的进展。外部行为者与社区研究人员之间的期望差异与独特的需求和现实以及社区的近期历史有关。适应性流程产生了一种重要工具，可以帮助所有参与者，在流程中管理不同的愿景，