当前位置: X-MOL 学术BMC Pulm. Med. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A new simple score of chronic cough: cough evaluation test
BMC Pulmonary Medicine ( IF 3.1 ) Pub Date : 2020-03-20 , DOI: 10.1186/s12890-020-1106-1
Wenzhi Zhan , Liting Zhang , Mei Jiang , Meihua Chen , Xiaoling Yuan , Jianxin Sun , Pusheng Xu , Feng Wu , Chunlai Zhang , Wei Luo , Xiaomei Chen , Hu Li , Kefang Lai

Chronic cough has an important impact on physical, social and psychological aspects. A simple and effective method to assess different aspects of chronic cough severity is required. We aimed to develop a simple, self-completed test, Cough Evaluation Test (CET), to evaluate cough severity and its impact on health. The items of preliminary CET were generated based on literature review and clinical practice. Items reduction was conducted by modified Delphi method. Patients with chronic cough were recruited to complete CET, Cough Visual Analog Scales (VAS), Mandarin Chinese version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ-MC), and Cough Symptom Score (CSS). Reassessments were performed at 1 week apart before treatment, and after more than 2 weeks treatments. Concurrent validation, internal consistency, repeatability, responsiveness and the minimal important difference (MID) were determined. CET consists of five items with a 5-point Likert scale (1–5 scaling of items, 5–25 score range). The Cronbach’s alpha values for CET was 0.80. CET showed a stronger correlation with LCQ-MC (r = − 0.74) compared to that between LCQ-MC with VAS (r = − 0.61). CET also showed a stronger correlation with VAS (r = 0.70) compared to that between VAS with other measures. Intraclass correlation coefficients for CET was 0.84. In patients undergoing treatment, CET scores significantly changed (p < 0.0001). The MID of CET was 2. Cough Evaluate Test is a reliable, valid and responsive tool to simply evaluate impact of cough on physical, social and psychological aspects.

中文翻译:

慢性咳嗽的一个新的简单评分:咳嗽评估测试

慢性咳嗽对身体,社会和心理方面都有重要影响。需要一种简单有效的方法来评估慢性咳嗽严重程度的不同方面。我们旨在开发一种简单,自我完成的测试,即咳嗽评估测试(CET),以评估咳嗽的严重程度及其对健康的影响。初步的CET项目是根据文献综述和临床实践得出的。通过改进的德尔菲方法进行项目减少。招募患有慢性咳嗽的患者,以完成CET,咳嗽视觉模拟量表(VAS),中文版的莱斯特咳嗽问卷(LCQ-MC)和咳嗽症状评分(CSS)。在治疗前和治疗2周后每隔1周进行一次重新评估。并发验证,内部一致性,可重复性,确定了响应能力和最小重要差异(MID)。CET由五项李克特量表(五至五项,分数范围为5-25)组成。CET的Cronbach的alpha值为0.80。与LCQ-MC和VAS(r =-0.61)相比,CET与LCQ-MC的相关性更强(r =-0.74)。与VAS与其他措施之间的相关性,CET与VAS的相关性也更强(r = 0.70)。CET的类内相关系数为0.84。在接受治疗的患者中,CET得分有显着变化(p <0.0001)。CET的MID为2。咳嗽评估测试是一种可靠,有效且反应迅速的工具,可以简单地评估咳嗽对身体,社会和心理方面的影响。CET由五项李克特量表(五至五项,分数范围为5-25)组成。CET的Cronbach的alpha值为0.80。与LCQ-MC和VAS(r =-0.61)相比,CET与LCQ-MC的相关性更强(r =-0.74)。与VAS与其他措施之间的相关性,CET与VAS的相关性也更强(r = 0.70)。CET的类内相关系数为0.84。在接受治疗的患者中,CET得分有明显变化(p <0.0001)。CET的MID为2。咳嗽评估测试是一种可靠,有效且反应迅速的工具,可以简单地评估咳嗽对身体,社会和心理方面的影响。CET由五项李克特量表(五至五项,分数范围为5-25)组成。CET的Cronbach的alpha值为0.80。与LCQ-MC和VAS(r =-0.61)相比,CET与LCQ-MC的相关性更强(r = − 0.74)。与VAS与其他措施之间的相关性,CET与VAS的相关性也更强(r = 0.70)。CET的类内相关系数为0.84。在接受治疗的患者中,CET得分有显着变化(p <0.0001)。CET的MID为2。咳嗽评估测试是一种可靠,有效且反应迅速的工具,可以简单地评估咳嗽对身体,社会和心理方面的影响。与VAS与其他措施之间的相关性,CET与VAS的相关性也更强(r = 0.70)。CET的类内相关系数为0.84。在接受治疗的患者中,CET得分有显着变化(p <0.0001)。CET的MID为2。咳嗽评估测试是一种可靠,有效且反应迅速的工具,可以简单地评估咳嗽对身体,社会和心理方面的影响。与VAS与其他措施之间的相关性,CET与VAS的相关性也更强(r = 0.70)。CET的类内相关系数为0.84。在接受治疗的患者中,CET得分有显着变化(p <0.0001)。CET的MID为2。咳嗽评估测试是一种可靠,有效且反应迅速的工具,可以简单地评估咳嗽对身体,社会和心理方面的影响。
更新日期:2020-04-22
down
wechat
bug